Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ligand Binding Sites02:40

Ligand Binding Sites

12.8K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
12.8K
Conserved Binding Sites01:49

Conserved Binding Sites

4.2K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
4.2K
Ligand Binding and Linkage00:49

Ligand Binding and Linkage

4.8K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked.  In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
4.8K
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength02:18

The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength

12.8K
The equilibrium binding constant (Kb) quantifies the strength of a protein-ligand interaction. Kb can be calculated as follows when the reaction is at equilibrium:
12.8K
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions01:58

Cooperative Allosteric Transitions

2.3K
2.3K
Conformations of Cyclohexane02:11

Conformations of Cyclohexane

12.2K
Cyclohexane does not exist in a planar form due to the high angle and torsional strain it would experience in the planar structure. Instead, it adopts non-planar chair and boat conformations.
The chair form is the most stable and derives its name from its resemblance to the “easy chair.” In the chair conformation, two carbon atoms are arranged out-of-plane — one above and one below, minimizing the torsional strain. In the chair form, the bond angle is very close to the ideal...
12.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

CSCAN: Conformational Analysis of Macrocyclic Peptides through NMR Chemical Shifts.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

From UK-2A to florylpicoxamid: Active learning to identify a mimic of a macrocyclic natural product.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Correction: Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2024
Same author

Complex peptide macrocycle optimization: combining NMR restraints with conformational analysis to guide structure-based and ligand-based design.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2023
Same author

Unmasking the True Identity of Rapamycin's Minor Conformer.

Journal of natural products·2023
Same author

A Distributional Model of Bound Ligand Conformational Strain: From Small Molecules up to Large Peptidic Macrocycles.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2023
Same journal

Integrated structure-based and fragment-guided design of isonicotinic acid derivatives as potential KDM4A inhibitors: an in silico study.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Coumarin-based small molecules for diabetes management: rational design, computational studies, synthesis, and biological evaluation.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Quantitative structure-activity relationship characterization and modeling of length-varying bioactive peptides.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Prot-ΔΔG: Prediction of protein-protein binding affinity changes upon mutations with pre-training strategies.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Computational exploration and in vitro validation of anti-quorum sensing potential of phytochemicals from Coleus amboinicus.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
Same journal

Exploring the HNE-inhibitory potential of in silico selected Moringa oleifera defense proteins.

Journal of computer-aided molecular design·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

11.3K

Structure-based pose prediction: Non-cognate docking extended to macrocyclic ligands.

Ann E Cleves1, Himani Tandon2, Ajay N Jain3

  • 1BioPharmics Division, Optibrium Limited, Cambridge, CB25 9PB, UK.

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
|October 16, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cross-docking predicts novel ligand poses, a difficult task in drug discovery. Updated benchmarks show Surflex-Dock and ForceGen methods achieve high accuracy for both non-macrocyclic and macrocyclic ligands.

Keywords:
AutoDockDockingForceGenGninaMacrocycleSurflex-DockVinaxGen

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.4K
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

440

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 10, 2025

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors
10:33

Development of Inhibitors of Protein-protein Interactions through REPLACE: Application to the Design and Development Non-ATP Competitive CDK Inhibitors

Published on: October 26, 2015

11.3K
Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA
10:21

Author Spotlight: Streamlining Protein Target Prediction and Validation via Molecular Docking and CETSA

Published on: February 23, 2024

2.4K
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

440

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • Structural biology
  • Drug discovery

Background:

  • Cross-docking predicts ligand binding poses for novel molecules, distinct from known cognate ligands.
  • Accurate prediction is crucial for identifying new drug candidates but challenging for structurally dissimilar ligands.
  • The PINC (PINC Is Not Cognate) benchmark was previously developed using temporal segregation to assess cross-docking performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To update and extend the PINC benchmark for evaluating cross-docking performance.
  • To assess the prediction accuracy for macrocyclic ligands using knowledge from non-macrocyclic ligands.
  • To compare the performance of Surflex-Dock and ForceGen against other docking methods.

Main Methods:

  • The PINC benchmark was expanded with 846 future ligands for ten targets, using early X-ray co-crystal structures.
  • An additional set of 13 targets with 128 macrocyclic ligands was introduced, predicting poses based on non-macrocyclic ligand structures.
  • Standard, automated protocols for Surflex-Dock and ForceGen were employed.

Main Results:

  • Performance was comparable for both the temporally-split non-macrocyclic and macrocycle prediction sets.
  • For the combined 974 ligands, Surflex-Dock and ForceGen achieved 68% success for the top-scoring pose family and 79% for the top-two.
  • Correct poses were identified 92% of the time, significantly outperforming AutoDock Vina and Gnina.

Conclusions:

  • The updated PINC benchmark provides a robust evaluation of cross-docking performance.
  • Surflex-Dock and ForceGen demonstrate high accuracy in predicting bound poses for diverse ligands, including challenging macrocycles.
  • These methods offer a significant advancement for structure-based drug discovery and virtual screening efforts.