Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026
05:26
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
Published on: January 7, 2019
Mixed methods research for the novice researcher.
Lynne S Giddings1, Barbara M Grant
1School of Nursing, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Contemporary Nurse
|November 7, 2006
Summary
This article explores various mixed methods research designs, popular in health and social sciences. It explains how to choose designs within different research paradigms for effective study planning.
Area of Science:
- Health Sciences
- Social Sciences
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Mixed methods research is gaining prominence in health and social sciences.
- Effective research design is crucial for study success.
- Understanding different research paradigms aids design choices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of various mixed methods research designs.
- To situate mixed methods research within a paradigmatic framework.
- To guide researchers in selecting appropriate mixed methods designs.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of mixed methods research designs.
- Explanation of paradigmatic frameworks relevant to research design.
- Discussion of the application of mixed methods across different research paradigms.
Main Results:
- Identification of diverse mixed methods designs.
- A framework for aligning research paradigms with design selection.
- Demonstration that mixed methods are adaptable to any research paradigm.
Conclusions:
- Mixed methods research offers flexibility across various scientific disciplines.
- Paradigmatic considerations are essential for informed mixed methods design selection.
- The integration of qualitative and quantitative approaches enhances research scope.
Related Concept Videos
02:01Group Design
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
01:50Cross-Sectional Research
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
02:40The Scientific Method
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
01:32The Scientific Method
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
03:50The Scientific Method
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
01:15Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...