Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Discrimination and scoring using small sets of genes for two-sample microarray data.

Gilles Guillot1, Maja Olsson, Mikael Benson

  • 1INRA, Applied Mathematics Department, Paris, France. guillot@inapg.inra.fr

Mathematical Biosciences
|November 8, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Combining Spatial Transcriptomics, Pseudotime, and Machine Learning Enables Discovery of Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer.

Cancer research·2025
Same author

Digital twins as global learning health and disease models for preventive and personalized medicine.

Genome medicine·2025
Same author

Proteogenomic analysis reveals Arp 2/3 complex as a common molecular mechanism in high risk pancreatic cysts and pancreatic cancer.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Legal obstacles jeopardise research in personalised medicine - experiences from a Nordic collaboration within rheumatology.

Scandinavian journal of public health·2024
Same author

Multiomics biomarkers were not superior to clinical variables for pan-cancer screening.

Communications medicine·2024
Same author

An interactive atlas of genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic biomarkers promotes the potential of proteins to predict complex diseases.

Scientific reports·2024
Same journal

The stability and bifurcations of ecosystems within resource constraints - Dedicated to Professor Shigui Ruan on the occasion of his 60th birthday.

Mathematical biosciences·2026
Same journal

The hydra and hormetic effects in a single discrete-time overcompensation model.

Mathematical biosciences·2026
Same journal

Seasonal impacts on brucellosis transmission mediated by live sheep supply-demand dynamics.

Mathematical biosciences·2026
Same journal

Optimal controls and cost-effectiveness analysis on the transmission dynamics of early blight disease in tomatoes.

Mathematical biosciences·2026
Same journal

Temperature-dependent dynamics and allee effect thresholds mediate fourfold cusp stability in biological control of invasive vectors.

Mathematical biosciences·2026
Same journal

Dynamics of a stochastic tumor-immune interaction system with an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.

Mathematical biosciences·2026
See all related articles

This study shows that analyzing gene expression using multiple genes significantly improves the discrimination between patient groups compared to single-gene analysis. This multivariate approach, using Hotelling

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Genomics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Microarray experiments are crucial for comparing gene expression between different groups.
  • Identifying distinct gene expression patterns is key to understanding diseases like atopic dermatitis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate multivariate statistical procedures for discriminating between two groups based on gene expression data.
  • To develop and assess methods using a small number of genes for improved diagnostic accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Application of Hotelling's T2 statistic for multivariate group discrimination.
  • Comparison of gene selection strategies based on univariate versus multivariate importance.
  • Utilizing Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) with gene sets selected by Hotelling's T2.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Multivariate analysis with multiple genes significantly enhances group discrimination over single-gene methods.
  • Key genes for multivariate discrimination may differ from those identified in univariate analyses.
  • LDA using 2-5 selected genes achieves performance comparable to methods using many more genes.

Conclusions:

  • Multivariate gene expression analysis, particularly with small gene sets, offers a powerful and potentially clinically applicable approach for disease discrimination.
  • Identifying key gene groups can reveal underlying disease pathways and networks.
  • The developed computational methods are available as an R package for broader use.