Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dynamic object recognition in pigeons and humans.

Marcia L Spetch1, Alinda Friedman, Quoc C Vuong

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. mspetch@ualberta.ca

Learning & Behavior
|November 9, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dose-dependent dorsal column activation drives analgesic effects of spinal cord stimulation in a rat model of neuropathic pain.

Regional anesthesia and pain medicine·2026
Same author

Effects of Initial Experiences on Risky Choice.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Combining social and private information: How ants use pheromones and learnt cues to navigate.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same author

Waiting for reward: preference for signalled delays increases with average wait time.

Animal cognition·2026
Same author

Electrophysiologic Characteristics of Epidural Spinal Signals in Preclinical Models of Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same author

Electrophysiological Characteristics of Epidural Spinal Signals in Preclinical Models of Spinal Cord Stimulation.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

Correction: Quantifying nonmnemonic strategies in two-alternative forced-choice delayed matching and nonmatching-to-position tasks in mice (Mus musculus) using automated video tracking technologies.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Unconditional stimulus deflation is stimulus specific.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

What is possible and what is worth: Higher levers afford more work and enhance the value of leisure.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Behavioral impact of adolescent social isolation stress: A multidimensional assessment in male NMRI mice.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Behavioral characteristics of rapid visual categorization learning in domestic chicks.

Learning & behavior·2026
Same journal

Operant conditioning through positive reinforcement in the ghost crab (Ocypode quadrata).

Learning & behavior·2026
See all related articles

Humans and pigeons recognize objects using motion cues. Differences emerge based on object decomposability, suggesting species-specific weighting of dynamic information in object recognition.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Comparative cognition
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Object recognition relies on both static and dynamic visual information.
  • Understanding how different species process dynamic cues is crucial for comparative cognition.
  • The role of motion in object recognition varies across species and object complexity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the role of dynamic information in human and pigeon object recognition.
  • To compare how humans and pigeons utilize motion cues for object discrimination.
  • To examine the influence of object decomposability on the use of dynamic information.

Main Methods:

  • Training humans and pigeons to discriminate objects based on characteristic motions.
  • Testing object recognition with learned, reversed, or novel motions, and novel objects in learned motions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Varying object decomposability (easy vs. difficult to decompose into parts).

    • Main Results:

    • Human performance decreased with any change in learned motion, regardless of object decomposability.
    • Humans did not differentiate novel objects presented with learned motions.
    • Pigeons mirrored human responses for decomposable objects but distinguished novel objects by motion.
    • For nondecomposable objects, pigeons exclusively relied on motion cues.

    Conclusions:

    • Dynamic information plays a significant role in object recognition for both humans and pigeons.
    • Species-specific differences exist in weighting dynamic information, particularly for nondecomposable objects.
    • Object decomposability modulates the reliance on motion cues in object recognition across species.