Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
Published on: March 11, 2021
Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification
L N McDermott1, M Wendling, B van Asselen
1Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute--Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device (a-Si EPID) dosimetry effectively replaced film and ionization chamber measurements for pre-treatment quality assurance. This advanced dosimetry identified systematic errors, improving treatment accuracy and efficiency in clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Radiotherapy Dosimetry
Background:
- Traditional pre-treatment dosimetry relied on film and ionization chambers, which can be time-consuming and less efficient.
- The integration of advanced imaging devices like amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging devices (a-Si EPID) offers potential for improved accuracy and efficiency in radiotherapy quality assurance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the replacement of film and ionization chamber measurements with a-Si EPID dosimetry for routine pre-treatment quality assurance in clinical practice.
- To illustrate the application of EPID dosimetry in identifying and resolving clinical issues related to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) plan delivery.
Main Methods:
- IMRT prostate plans were delivered to a phantom, with transit images acquired using an a-Si EPID for each segment.
- An in-house back-projection algorithm reconstructed dose distributions, and segment dose images were summed for field comparisons using gamma analysis (3%/3 mm criteria).
- EPID measurements were compared against film and ionization chamber measurements for both field-by-field and isocenter dose verification.
Main Results:
- EPID and film measurements showed excellent agreement for 50 fields (gamma avg = 0.16, gamma max = 1.00, P gamma < 1 = 100%), leading to the discontinuation of film use.
- EPID and ionization chamber isocenter dose measurements agreed well (average ratio = 1.00), with both systematically underestimating the planned dose (average ratio = 0.99).
- Comparison of EPID mid-plane dose images with 3D dose grids revealed under-dosage in 7 plans (5-16%), attributed to segment overlap or junctions, which was resolved by adjusting treatment planning system parameters.
Conclusions:
- a-Si EPID dosimetry is a reliable and accurate replacement for film and ionization chambers in pre-treatment verification of IMRT plans.
- EPID dosimetry efficiently detects systematic errors, enabling adjustments to treatment planning system parameters and clinical plans, thereby enhancing treatment accuracy.
- The efficiency and accuracy of EPID dosimetry make it a valuable tool for routine IMRT quality assurance, requiring only one set of measurements per plan.
More Related Videos
08:34Proton Therapy Delivery and Its Clinical Application in Select Solid Tumor Malignancies
Published on: February 6, 2019
07:57Positron Emission Tomography-based Dose Painting Radiation Therapy in a Glioblastoma Rat Model using the Small Animal Radiation Research Platform
Published on: March 24, 2022