Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

Analyzing Melts and Fluids from Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations with the UMD Package
Published on: September 17, 2021
Nucleation simulations using the fluid dynamics software FLUENT with the fine particle model FPM
Erik Herrmann1, Heikki Lihavainen, Antti-Pekka Hyvärinen
1Department of Physical Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland, Particle Dynamics GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
The FLUENT-FPM software package underestimates alcohol nucleation rates but can reproduce experimental trends. Adjusting the nucleation rate allows simulation of vapor depletion effects.
Area of Science:
- Physical Chemistry
- Chemical Engineering
- Computational Fluid Dynamics
Background:
- Classical nucleation theory often underestimates nucleation rates for alcohol vapors.
- Accurate simulation of nucleation phenomena is crucial for understanding aerosol formation and atmospheric processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the capability of the FLUENT-FPM software package in simulating homogeneous nucleation experiments.
- To compare FPM simulations with experimental data and an established model (femtube2).
Main Methods:
- Verification of the FPM condensation routine using the NEWALC code.
- Simulation of homogeneous nucleation of n-butanol, n-pentanol, and n-hexanol in a laminar flow diffusion chamber (LFDC).
- Comparison of FPM results against experimental data and the femtube2 model.
Main Results:
- FPM underestimates particle production by several orders of magnitude, though the underestimation factor is constant per nucleation isotherm.
- FPM reproduces experimental trends in nucleated particle concentration (N) dependence on flow rate.
- Corrected FPM simulations successfully model experimentally observed vapor depletion effects.
- FPM predicts lower saturation ratios than the femtube2 model, with significant differences in vapor depletion behavior.
- FPM simulations confirm the carrier gas effect previously identified by Lihavainen and Viisanen (2001).
Conclusions:
- While FPM underestimates nucleation rates, it captures key experimental behaviors and can be calibrated to simulate vapor depletion.
- FPM provides a valuable tool for studying nucleation, but its predictions require careful comparison with experimental data and other models.
- The study highlights the importance of accounting for vapor depletion and carrier gas effects in nucleation simulations.
Related Concept Videos
Accelerating Fluids
The motion of the liquid within this infinitesimal cylinder is considered to obtain the pressure difference. Three vertical forces act on this liquid:
Newtonian Fluid: Problem Solving
A velocity gradient forms within the fluid when a Newtonian fluid is placed between two parallel plates, with...
Fluid Mosaic Model
Fluid Mosaic Model
Precipitate Formation and Particle Size Control
The obtained precipitate should be either a pure substance of known composition or easily converted to one by a simple process, such as ignition or drying. In addition, the precipitate should be insoluble and easily filterable. In general, filterability...
Capillarity in Fluid
Surface tension is crucial to capillarity. It results from cohesive forces between liquid molecules at the liquid-air boundary, forming a skin that resists external forces. When the capillary tube...
