Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
[What can we expect of Collaborative Review Groups of Cochrane Collaboration in neuropaediatrics?]
J González de Dios1, J A Balaguer-Santamaría
1Departamento de Pediatría, Hospital Universitario San Juan, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain. gonzalez_jav@gva.es
Insights
Systematic reviews (SR) on pediatric neurology are rare, focusing mainly on epilepsy treatment and neonatal issues. Many childhood neurological conditions lack evidence-based reviews, hindering informed clinical decisions.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Evidence-based medicine
- Bibliometrics
Context:
- Cochrane Collaboration (CC) provides systematic reviews (SR) of scientific evidence.
- Paediatric neurology research requires comprehensive evidence synthesis.
Purpose:
- To bibliometrically analyze SR in paediatric neurology within the CC.
- To identify research gaps and areas needing further evidence.
Summary:
- A bibliometric analysis of 2,231 SR in the CC revealed only nine related to paediatric neurology.
- Key areas included epilepsy treatment, neonatal neurology (intraventricular hemorrhage, perinatal asphyxia), and miscellaneous conditions.
- All identified SR focused on treatment interventions.
Impact:
- Paediatric neurology SR represent a small fraction (3.6%) of CC reviews.
- Evidence-based decisions are supported for epilepsy pharmacologic treatment, intraventricular hemorrhage management, and bacterial meningitis.
- Significant gaps exist for conditions like ADHD, intellectual disability, and hypotonia, indicating a need for more research.
Introduction:
Cochrane Collaboration (CC) contains detailed, critical and up-to-date systematic reviews (SR) of the best scientific evidence available.
Aim:
To analyse the bibliometric characteristics of the SR related to paediatric neurology published in the 50 Collaborative Review Groups (CRG) of the CC.
Materials And Methods:
Bibliometric analysis of the Database of Systematic Reviews in Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005 (n = 2.231 SR). The variables recorded were: number of SR and protocols in any CRG, authors and clusters of secondary research, dates (late review and update), type of study, critical review of the SR and conclusions.
Results:
Nine published SR about neuropaediatrics: the Epilepsy Group (24 SR), the Neuromuscular Disease Group (16), the Neonatal Group (16), the Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems Group (10), the Pain, Palliative Care and Supportive Care Group (4), the Movement Disorders Group (3), the Injuries Group (3), the Infectious Disease Group (3) and the Acute Respiratory Infections Group (2). The three main thematic areas were treatment of epilepsy (pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic), neonatal neurology (mainly intraventricular haemorrhage and perinatal asphyxia) and miscellanea (autism spectrum disorder, headache, cerebral palsy, myasthenia gravis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, Bell's palsy and bacterial meningitis). All the SR were about treatment interventions.
Conclusions:
Paediatric neurology SR are infrequent (3.6% of the 2.231 SR published in CC), and helps an evidence-based decision-making in a few areas: pharmacologic treatment of epilepsy, management of intraventricular haemorrhage of preterm infants and bacterial meningitis. Many therapies in paediatric neurology persist with no supporting evidence, and we detected no SR about important neurological issues in childhood as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, mental retardation and hypotonia.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment:
Standards of Care II
