Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

High-Resolution Endocardial and Epicardial Optical Mapping in a Sheep Model of Stretch-Induced Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 29, 2011
Evaluating fluctuations in human atrial fibrillatory cycle length using monophasic action potentials
Sanjiv M Narayan1, David E Krummen, Andrew M Kahn
1Electrophysiology Service, University of California and Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, San Diego, California 92161, USA. snarayan@ucsd.edu
Autocorrelation accurately measures atrial fibrillation cycle length, outperforming spectral dominant frequency, especially in bipolar signals. Stable measurements require over 10 seconds, revealing that cycle length changes precede organization shifts.
Area of Science:
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Arrhythmias
- Signal Processing in Medicine
Background:
- Identifying short atrial fibrillation (AF) cycle length (CL) sites is crucial for ablation targets, as cycle lengthening predicts success.
- Optimal methods for measuring AF CL and its stability remain unclear, necessitating advanced signal analysis techniques.
- Spectral dominant frequency (DF) may be prone to double counting, while autocorrelation offers a potentially more accurate estimation method.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate fluctuations in intracardiac atrial fibrillation (AF) cycle length (CL).
- To compare the accuracy and stability of autocorrelation versus spectral dominant frequency (DF) for AF CL measurement.
- To determine the optimal duration for stable AF CL assessment.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 49 AF epochs from 28 patients using monophasic action potentials (MAPs) from the high (HRA) and low (LRA) right atrium.
- Estimation of AF CL using spectral DF and autocorrelation over varying durations (2 seconds, 10 seconds, 2 minutes) in MAPs and filtered bipoles.
- Comparison of measurement accuracy and error rates between spectral DF and autocorrelation methods.
Main Results:
- Autocorrelation demonstrated superior accuracy in estimating both MAP (R=0.92) and bipolar (R=0.83) AF CL compared to spectral DF.
- Spectral DF showed poor correlation with bipolar signals (R=0.31) but good correlation with MAPs (R=0.73), indicating susceptibility to double counting.
- Changes in DF consistently preceded reciprocal changes in organization, while AF CL measurements were stable when analyzed over 10 seconds or longer.
Conclusions:
- Autocorrelation is a more reliable method for estimating AF CL than spectral DF, particularly for bipolar signals.
- AF CL measurements are stable and reliable when analyzed over durations exceeding 10 seconds.
- Observed fluctuations indicate that AF CL changes precede organization changes, offering insights into AF dynamics.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
08:05Optimization of Transesophageal Atrial Pacing to Assess Atrial Fibrillation Susceptibility in Mice
Published on: June 29, 2022
Related Concept Videos
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials
Dysrhythmias III: Characteristics of Dysrhythmias
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...