Handedness and spinal deformity

Biological lateralisation is clearly manifest in scoliosis, yet its relevance is unclear. Goldberg et al. (Spine. 15(2):61-64. 1990) found an association between curve pattern and hand-preference in a screened population, but no increase in sinistrality. Milenkovic et al, (European Journal of Epidemiology, 19:969-972,2004) concluded left-handedness was a risk factor in a screened group. The database was reassessed to determine whether clinically significant scoliosis was associated with sinistrality or differed from the population norm of 10%. Patients attending the scoliosis clinic were asked their preferred writing hand. 1,636 patients were identified with complete data. Overall, left handedness occurred in 11.5%, greater than the general population (p=0.04) Left hand preference was found to be increased in boys with infantile idiopathic scoliosis and in girls with infantile, juvenile, congenital and syndromic scoliosis, but was reduced in girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis lateralisation was random in infantile and congenital scoliosis, while left curve patterns were decreased in girls with juvenile idiopathic scoliosis and increased in boys with syndromic scoliosis. Curve pattern and handedness correlated in asymmetry in boys and girls and in girls with radiologically confirmed adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, but not in any other type. This study cannot confirm findings of left-handedness as a risk factor for spinal deformity. Its incidence is reduced in girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and the increased sinistrality in infantile scoliosis is not a new finding (Rauterberg & Tonnis Ger. Z.Orthop. 109(14):676-689. 1971). Lateralisation is undoubtedly a factor in scoliosis, but does not have a simple causal relationship, probably deriving from the underlying scoliotic process, rather than contributing to it.