Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Management of data quality--development of a computer-mediated guideline
Jürgen Stausberg1, Michael Nonnemacher, Dorothea Weiland
1Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Medical Faculty, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. stausberg@uni-essen.de
This study introduces a guideline to improve electronic health data quality by adapting source data verification (SDV) and feedback procedures. It aims to reduce data management costs in German research networks through systematic quality indicators and automated calculations.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Data Management
- Epidemiological Research
Background:
- Electronic health data quality is critical for research and healthcare.
- Current data quality management relies on source data verification (SDV) and feedback, which can be resource-intensive.
- A need exists to adapt these procedures for efficiency, particularly within German research networks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a guideline for managing data quality in electronic health data.
- To adapt SDV and feedback procedures to current quality levels, reducing data management costs.
- To support research networks in Germany conducting epidemiological studies and managing registers.
Main Methods:
- Conducted a thorough literature review to identify quality indicators.
- Assigned quality indicators to levels: plausibility, organization, and trueness.
- Defined operational methods for automatic calculation of quality indicators and SDV sample size.
- Developed a guideline implemented in a software tool with adaptation and improvement cycles.
Main Results:
- Identified numerous potential quality indicators but noted a lack of systematic assessment and concepts for SDV and feedback.
- Developed an SDV sample size calculation that adjusts based on data quality.
- Created a guideline with a software tool incorporating study-specific adaptation and a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle for continuous quality improvement.
Conclusions:
- The developed guideline offers a systematic approach to managing electronic health data quality.
- The adaptive SDV and feedback mechanisms can reduce data management costs.
- The guideline is applicable across various medical documentation contexts, including clinical studies, registers, and surveillance databases.
Related Concept Videos
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Quality Control
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.