Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening for colon cancer.

J P Heiken1

  • 1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. heikenj@wustl.edu

Cancer Imaging : the Official Publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society
|November 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Late recurrence of malignant melanoma presenting as peritoneal "carcinomatosis".

Abdominal imaging·2003
Same author

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniques.

Radiology·2001
Same author

Renal cysts: is attenuation artifactually increased on contrast-enhanced CT images?

Radiology·2000
Same author

Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.

Radiology·2000
Same author

Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view.

Medical physics·2000
Same journal

When PSMA is not enough: the diagnostic blind spots of PSMA PET/CT and the added value of [¹⁸F]FDG in high-risk prostate cancer: dual-tracer cohort study.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of audiovisual and auditory interventions on exam anxiety during whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in cancer patients: a quasi-experimental study.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
Same journal

Predictive imaging biomarkers on whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWMRI) and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]GaPSMA-PET/CT for [<sup>177</sup>Lu]LuPSMA therapy in metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
Same journal

Correction to: [¹⁸F]PSMA-1007 and [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a prospective head-to-head comparison and assessment of PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy applicability.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
Same journal

MRI-based perfusion-diffusion habitat analysis for characterizing intratumoral heterogeneity in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
Same journal

Survival prediction of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients with recurrent neuroblastoma.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2026
See all related articles

Colorectal cancer screening significantly lowers mortality rates in adults aged 50 and older. Despite proven benefits, screening uptake remains low, highlighting a need for improved adherence and awareness of available tests.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Preventive Medicine
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening effectively reduces mortality in individuals aged 50 and above.
  • Current CRC screening tests present distinct advantages and limitations, with no universal consensus on the optimal approach.
  • Low screening rates persist despite the established benefits of early detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the clinical evidence supporting colorectal cancer screening in average and high-risk populations.
  • To discuss the pros and cons of existing colorectal cancer screening modalities.
  • To outline current screening guidelines and explore emerging technologies in colorectal cancer detection.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of clinical evidence on colorectal cancer screening.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of advantages and disadvantages of various screening tests.
  • Summary of current evidence-based screening guidelines for different risk groups.
  • Exploration of novel and developing colorectal cancer screening technologies.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical evidence supports the efficacy of colorectal cancer screening in reducing mortality.
    • A range of screening tests are available, each with specific benefits and drawbacks.
    • Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening vary based on individual risk factors.
    • New technologies are emerging to enhance the detection and accessibility of colorectal cancer screening.

    Conclusions:

    • Colorectal cancer screening is a proven method for reducing cancer mortality.
    • Understanding the nuances of different screening tests is crucial for clinical decision-making.
    • Adherence to recommended screening guidelines is vital for population health.
    • Advancements in screening technology hold promise for improving future colorectal cancer detection rates.