Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological issues in infertility research.

Salim Daya1

  • 1ISIS Regional Fertility Centre, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. dayas@mcmaster.ca

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|November 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2016
Same author

Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Fertility and sterility·2016
Same author

Luteal support: progestogens for pregnancy protection.

Maturitas·2009
Same author

Aromatase inhibitors in infertility treatment: risks and benefits.

Women's health (London, England)·2009
Same author

WITHDRAWN: Luteal phase support in assisted reproduction cycles.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2008
Same author

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.

Fertility and sterility·2007

High-quality research is crucial for evidence-based healthcare decisions. This guide details ten methodological issues to improve the evaluation of therapeutic interventions, especially in infertility management.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Epidemiology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Reproductive Medicine

Background:

  • Clinical decision-making relies on valid study evidence.
  • Appraising evidence quality is essential for effective healthcare.
  • Many studies have methodological limitations impacting reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss critical methodological issues in evaluating therapeutic intervention efficacy.
  • To provide a framework for informing gynecological practice, particularly in infertility management.
  • To enhance the quality of evidence used in clinical decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of ten key methodological issues in study design and analysis.
  • Illustrative examples from medical literature.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on issues relevant to assisted reproductive technology and infertility.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified ten critical factors for rigorous study evaluation.
    • Emphasized the importance of randomization, blinding, and sample size.
    • Highlighted the need for appropriate analysis (e.g., intention-to-treat) and study orientation (superiority, equivalence).

    Conclusions:

    • Rigorous methodological evaluation is paramount for reliable evidence in healthcare.
    • Adherence to these principles improves the quality of research informing clinical practice.
    • This approach is particularly relevant for optimizing infertility treatments.