Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Variation in evolutionary processes at different codon positions.

Lee Bofkin1, Nick Goldman

  • 1European Molecular Biology Laboratory-European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|November 23, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

IQ-TREE 3: phylogenomic inference software using complex evolutionary models.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same author

Rate variation and recurrent sequence errors in pandemic-scale phylogenetics.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Assessing phylogenetic confidence at pandemic scales.

Nature·2025
Same author

Highly Recurrent Multinucleotide Mutations in SARS-CoV-2.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same author

Raman identification of single nucleotides flowing through permeable plasmonic films.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Detecting Interspecific Positive Selection Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Molecular biology and evolution·2025
Same journal

Population Epigenetics: Deciphering DNA Methylation Diversity and its Implications for Health, Disease, and Evolution.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Genomic signature of repeated transitions to diurnality in spiders.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

The transcriptional and translational outcomes for pseudogenes in bacterial endosymbionts.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

800 million years of co-evolution in the green plant lineage - the case of LEUNIG and SEUSS transcriptional co-regulators.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Codon-position models better explain protein-coding sequence evolution than homogeneous models by accounting for distinct evolutionary pressures at each codon position (CPs). This research reveals new insights into protein evolution and selective constraints.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Molecular Evolution
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Traditional evolutionary models assume uniform substitution rates across DNA sequences.
  • This assumption is inaccurate for protein-coding sequences due to varying evolutionary pressures at different codon positions (CPs).
  • Homogeneous models fail to capture these distinct pressures, limiting their explanatory power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how codon-position (CP) models outperform homogeneous models in analyzing protein-coding sequence evolution.
  • To characterize the differences in evolutionary processes and model parameter estimates across the three CPs.
  • To explore the implications of these findings for understanding functional constraints and improving evolutionary analyses.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized the PANDIT database of multiple species DNA sequence alignments.
  • Systematically quantified differences in evolutionary processes across the three CPs.
  • Applied methods to an overlapping reading frame dataset to assess evolutionary constraints.
  • Main Results:

    • Codon-position models provide a more accurate representation of protein-coding sequence evolution compared to homogeneous models.
    • Significant differences in evolutionary processes and parameter estimates were identified across the three CPs.
    • Overlapping reading frames do not inherently impose more stringent evolutionary constraints than previously assumed.

    Conclusions:

    • The study elucidates previously undescribed features of protein evolution by differentiating evolutionary dynamics at each codon position.
    • Findings enhance the understanding of selective constraints, influenced by the genetic code, protein function, and mutation types.
    • Results offer potential applications for refining phylogenetic analyses and gene-finding techniques.