Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bridging the gap: using triangulation methodology to estimate minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs).

Nancy Kline Leidy1, Kathleen W Wyrwich

  • 1MEDTAP International, 7101 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA. Leidy@medtap.com

COPD
|December 2, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of Mavacamten on Disease-Related Symptoms in Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: HCMSQ Outcomes in EXPLORER-HCM.

Journal of cardiac failure·2026
Same author

Development of the modified Daily Symptom Diary (mDSD): a patient-reported outcome measure of dysphagia for eosinophilic esophagitis.

Current medical research and opinion·2025
Same author

A Unified Set of Patient-inspired Health Concepts for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A North Star for Understanding Treatment Benefit.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2024
Same author

The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire in Relation to New York Heart Association Class.

Journal of cardiac failure·2024
Same author

The Psychometric Performance of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Journal of cardiac failure·2024
Same author

Mavacamten in Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Referred for Septal Reduction: Health Status Analysis Through Week 56 in VALOR-HCM Trial.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2024
Same journal

Number Needed to Treat with Biologics in Type-2 Inflammation COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

COPD·2026
Same journal

Global, Regional, and National Burden of COPD Attributable to Secondhand Smoke from 1990 to 2021: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.

COPD·2026
Same journal

Upregulation of LncRNA MIR31HG in COPD Correlates with Disease Severity and Facilitates Inflammation via miR-342-3p.

COPD·2026
Same journal

Methodological Considerations in the Development of the AECOPD "Infection Score".

COPD·2026
Same journal

Barriers and Facilitators to Treatment Plan Adoption and Self-Management in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Search and Narrative Synthesis.

COPD·2026
Same journal

Airway Mucus Occlusions in Ex-Smokers with and Without COPD.

COPD·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces triangulation to interpret health outcome changes, integrating diverse data for reliable guidelines. This method ensures findings are clinically relevant and empirically sound across various health measures.

Area of Science:

  • Health outcomes research
  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Patient-reported outcomes

Background:

  • Interpreting change scores in health outcomes requires standardized, reliable guidelines.
  • Existing methods may be field-specific or limited by their chosen methodology.
  • Developing universally applicable interpretation guidelines is crucial for clinical relevance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and illustrate the triangulation methodology for deriving guidelines to interpret health outcome measure change scores.
  • To develop and apply these guidelines using data from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
  • To ensure guidelines are not field-specific or method-bound.

Main Methods:

  • Triangulation methodology integrating global ratings, clinical benchmarks, statistical magnitude estimates, and qualitative patient/clinician data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Secondary analysis of 2,971 patients from three Phase IIIa clinical trials for the Breathlessness Diary (BD).
  • Examination of BD scores by disease severity, rescue medication use, and comparison with FEV1 and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire changes.

    • Main Results:

    • Guidelines were developed for defining large, moderate, and small group-level mean changes on the Breathlessness Diary.
    • Analysis revealed divergences and convergences between statistical indicators and clinical benchmarks.
    • Qualitative data provided insights into patient perspectives on dyspnea change.

    Conclusions:

    • The triangulation methodology provides empirically sound and clinically relevant guidelines for interpreting health outcome changes.
    • This integrated approach enhances the reliability and applicability of change score interpretation across different health contexts.
    • The developed guidelines for the Breathlessness Diary demonstrate the practical utility of the triangulation method in COPD research.