Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Adaptive allocation and failure saving in randomised clinical trials.

Uttam Bandyopadhyay1, Rahul Bhattacharya

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India. bandyopadhyay@yahoo.com

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|December 7, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating the patient journey through integrated mental health services using routinely collected data: utility of the DIALOG patient-reported outcome and experience measure.

BJPsych bulletin·2026
Same author

Use of outcome measures in psychiatry: Royal College of Psychiatrists' survey of members.

BJPsych bulletin·2026
Same author

Risk stratified treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre observational study from India.

The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia·2025
Same author

Implementing peer support into practice in mental health services: a qualitative comparative case study.

BMC health services research·2024
Same author

Challenges for maintaining post elimination phase of visceral leishmaniasis control programme in India: A field-based study.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2024
Same author

Creative pursuits for mental health and well-being.

Indian journal of psychiatry·2024

This study introduces a new adaptive clinical trial design balancing ethical considerations and treatment optimality. The novel randomized design is compared to existing methods using performance metrics.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Adaptive designs are crucial for efficient clinical trials.
  • Balancing ethical patient allocation with optimal treatment selection is a key challenge.
  • Existing designs may not adequately address both ethical and optimality concerns.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel randomized two-treatment single period response adaptive design.
  • To integrate ethical considerations with a meaningful definition of optimality.
  • To evaluate the performance of the new design against existing rules.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a randomized response adaptive design.
  • Incorporation of ethical principles and a defined optimality criterion.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis using various performance measures.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed design effectively combines ethical considerations and optimality.
    • Performance metrics demonstrate the advantages of the new adaptive design.
    • Comparison highlights areas where the new rule outperforms existing ones.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed adaptive design offers a promising approach for clinical trials.
    • This design provides a balanced framework for ethical and optimal treatment allocation.
    • Further research can explore extensions of this adaptive design methodology.