Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do we need to challenge thoughts in cognitive behavior therapy?

Richard J Longmore1, Michael Worrell

  • 1Central and North West London Mental Health NHS Trust, United Kingdom. richard.longmore@nhs.net

Clinical Psychology Review
|December 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Existential Approaches and Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Challenges and Potential.

International journal of cognitive therapy·2021
Same author

Challenging Hofmann's negative thoughts: A rebuttal.

Clinical psychology review·2018
Same author

Couple-based Intervention for Depression: An Effectiveness Study in the National Health Service in England.

Family process·2017
Same author

Dupuytren's disease.

Orthopedics·2012
Same author

The use of therapist self-disclosure: clinical psychology trainees' experiences.

Psychotherapy research : journal of the Society for Psychotherapy Research·2009

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) may not require directly challenging thoughts. Research suggests cognitive interventions may not significantly improve therapy outcomes or cause symptom change.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychotherapy Research

Background:

  • Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) traditionally focuses on modifying maladaptive thoughts to alleviate psychological distress.
  • Recent literature questions the necessity of directly challenging cognitions in CBT, citing empirical anomalies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review the empirical literature addressing challenges to CBT's core assumptions.
  • To examine the evidence regarding the necessity of challenging thoughts in CBT.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive review of component studies in CBT research.
  • Analysis of empirical data on cognitive mediators and symptomatic change.

Main Results:

  • Component analyses provide little evidence that specific cognitive interventions significantly enhance therapy effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Limited empirical support exists for cognitive change being causal in CBT-induced symptomatic improvements.

    • Conclusions:

    • The necessity of directly challenging thoughts in CBT is questioned based on current empirical evidence.
    • Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of change in CBT.