Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimizing higher-order aberrations with intraocular lens technology.

Roberto Bellucci1, Simonetta Morselli

  • 1Ophthalmic Unit, Hospital and University of Verona, Italy. roberto.bellucci@azosp.vr.it

Current Opinion in Ophthalmology
|December 13, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effect of forced infusion in phacoemulsification training: a comparative study.

International ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Pressure-Induced stromal keratopathy immediate recovery after 30-gauge needle paracentesis.

European journal of ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Iris Fixation for Intraocular Lens Dislocation: Relocation with Iris Suture Versus Exchange to Sutureless Iris Claw IOL.

Journal of clinical medicine·2024
Same author

Comparison of Objective and Subjective Visual Outcomes Between Pentafocal and Trifocal Diffractive Intraocular Lenses.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)·2024
Same author

12-year follow-up of the first endothelial keratoplasty without Descemet stripping in a 3-month newborn with Congenital Hereditary Endothelial Dystrophy (CHED).

BMC ophthalmology·2023
Same author

Reply: Automated and subjective refraction with monofocal, multifocal, and EDOF intraocular lenses: review.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2023
Same journal

Laser vision correction (LASIK, PRK, SMILE) with simultaneous accelerated corneal crosslinking.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Traumatic macular hole: observe, operate, or other options.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

The evolving role of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: basic science, translation, and clinical integration.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: reducing risk for refractive surgery.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Updates on Refractive Surgery: Benefits, Risks, and Costs of Modern Treatment Options.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
Same journal

Corneal Allogeneic Intrastromal Ring Segments for keratoconus - recent evidence and the move to customized and custom shaped CAIRS.

Current opinion in ophthalmology·2026
See all related articles

Aspheric intraocular lenses correct corneal spherical aberration, enhancing optical quality. However, factors like decentration and pupil size can limit their effectiveness in improving vision.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Optical Engineering
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Aspheric intraocular lens (IOL) technology has advanced significantly in recent years.
  • A growing variety of aspheric IOLs with differing levels of asphericity are now available.
  • While demonstrating efficacy in correcting spherical aberration, the overall theoretical advantages remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current understanding of aspheric intraocular lens performance.
  • To evaluate the impact of aspheric IOLs on ocular optical quality.
  • To identify factors influencing the clinical outcomes of aspheric IOL implantation.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of investigations evaluating aspheric IOLs in implanted eyes.
  • Review of theoretical studies using model eyes to assess optical performance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of optical quality metrics including Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and Point Spread Function (PSF).

    • Main Results:

    • Aspheric IOLs successfully correct positive spherical aberration, improving optical quality metrics like MTF, PSF, and contrast sensitivity.
    • Theoretical models indicate potential limitations, particularly sensitivity to decentration.
    • Light scattering significantly impacts actual optical quality, a factor not captured by simple aberration analysis.

    Conclusions:

    • Aspheric IOLs provide a measurable reduction in spherical aberration and improved optical quality compared to standard spherical IOLs.
    • Clinical benefits can be diminished by factors such as lens decentration, small pupil size, and media opacity.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the clinical advantages and limitations of aspheric IOLs.