Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Economic evaluation for ophthalmologists.

Hannah Kuper1, Mireia Jofre-Bonet, Clare Gilbert

  • 1International Centre for Eye Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. hannah.kuper@lshtm.ac.uk

Ophthalmic Epidemiology
|December 16, 2006
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Visual acuity outcome and complications of cataract surgery in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

International health·2026
Same author

Severe ROP rate and assessment of the burden of ROP screening at a single tertiary care public hospital in Pakistan.

BMC ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Screening for retinopathy of prematurity in South Africa: are those developing severe ROP screened on time? Data from a prospective register.

BMJ open ophthalmology·2025
Same author

Integrating eye health into a child health policy in Tanzania: global and national influences.

Health policy and planning·2025
Same author

Prevalence and risk factors of pre-senile lens opacities in the 1969-73 Vellore Birth Cohort.

Eye (London, England)·2025
Same author

Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Management of Congenital Hyperinsulinism: A National User-satisfaction Survey, UK.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2025
Same journal

Nationwide Analysis of Eye-Related Emergency Department Visits in South Korea: NEDIS-EYE REPORT 1.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Association Between Demyelinating Disease and Dry Eye Syndrome: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Correspondence: Caution May Be Required with mRNA Covid-19 Vaccinations Related to the Corneal Endothelium.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Development of Macular Ganglion Cell Layer Thickness in Children: The Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 Eye Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Impact of Cataract Surgery on Psychological Well-Being and Economy: The SCOPE Study Protocol.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Online Survey on Myopia Progression Among Chinese Adult Undergraduates: A Pilot Study.

Ophthalmic epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Economic evaluation optimizes healthcare resource allocation by comparing intervention costs and effects. Standardizing its use can improve care quality and efficiency, enabling more programs to be funded.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Ophthalmology
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Ophthalmic services face funding constraints globally, necessitating efficient resource allocation.
  • Economic evaluation is crucial for comparing interventions and optimizing scarce healthcare resources.
  • Understanding economic evaluation principles aids critical appraisal and decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe fundamental concepts of economic evaluation.
  • To provide examples from ophthalmic literature.
  • To equip readers for critical appraisal, funding decisions, and understanding intervention economics.

Main Methods:

  • Review of economic evaluation principles and types (cost-minimization, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Explanation of cost and effect measurement (monetary, disease-specific, quality of life).
  • Introduction to economic models (decision trees, Markov models) and sensitivity analyses.

    • Main Results:

    • Economic evaluation compares intervention costs against their effectiveness and consequences.
    • Four primary types of economic evaluations exist, each with specific applications.
    • Economic models quantify costs and effects, incorporating all intervention consequences.

    Conclusions:

    • Economic evaluation identifies the most efficient allocation of scarce resources.
    • Standardized economic evaluation can enhance healthcare quality and efficiency.
    • Improved efficiency through economic evaluation can lead to increased program funding.