Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Conditions of contact, common in-group identity, and in-group bias toward contingent workers
Jukka Lipponen1, Johanna Leskinen
1Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland. jukka.lipponen@helsinki.fi
Abstract:
In a survey-based field study of 111 permanent Finnish restaurant employees, the authors investigated intergroup relations between permanent and contingent workers. On the basis of the common in-group identity model, the authors hypothesized that the conditions of contact (supportive norms and perceived intergroup competition) would be related to common in-group identity, which in turn would be negatively related to intergroup bias. The present results indicated that perceived competition and institutional support were related to in-group bias only through their influence on the common in-group identity, as the model predicted.
More Related Videos
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
06:18The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
In- and Out-Groups
Confirmation Biases
Stereotype Content Model
Impact of Groups on Groups
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Correspondence Bias