Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 18, 2026

06:45
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Current task activation predicts general effects of advance preparation in task switching
Edita Poljac1, Ab de Haan, Gerard P van Galen
1Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands. e.poljac@nici.ru.nl
Experimental Psychology
|December 21, 2006
Summary
Advance preparation significantly impacts task performance, especially with short preparation intervals (PI) in between-subjects designs. This preparation effect extends beyond initial trials in task switching.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Human Performance
Background:
- Task switching research explores cognitive control and executive functions.
- Preparation intervals (PI) are crucial for understanding how advance information influences task execution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of preparation on general task performance in reaction-time matching tasks.
- To compare the effects of within-subjects versus between-subjects preparation interval manipulations.
Main Methods:
- Two experiments measured response times (RTs) and error rates in color- and shape-matching tasks.
- Task blocks involved repetition or switching, with manipulated preparation intervals (PI).
- PI was manipulated within-subjects in Experiment 1 and between-subjects in Experiment 2.
Main Results:
- Comparable task performance was observed after long PIs in both within- and between-subjects designs.
- Short PIs led to significantly improved performance in the between-subjects design.
- Preparation effects were analogous for both task switching and task repetitions.
- Consistent switch costs and within-run slowing effects were noted.
Conclusions:
- Advance preparation effects extend beyond initial trials in task switching.
- Findings support and refine the activation approach to task switching.
- The design of preparation intervals (within- vs. between-subjects) critically influences task performance outcomes.
