An ethics of expertise based on informed consent

Area of Science:

• Science ethics
• Expert communication
• Public engagement with science

Background:

• Scientists have a moral responsibility to benefit society through information dissemination.
• Communicating scientific information during politically charged, uncertain debates presents ethical challenges.
• Existing ethical frameworks need adaptation for scientific expertise in public discourse.

Purpose of the Study:

• To develop a theoretical framework for an
• ethics of expertise
• (EOE).
• To explore how the principle of informed consent can inform scientific responsibilities to the public.
• To provide practical guidance for scientists disseminating information on complex issues.

Main Methods:

• Developing a theoretical framework for the ethics of expertise.
• Drawing parallels between biomedical ethics' informed consent and scientific information dissemination.
• Analyzing a case study on communicating low-dose toxic chemical effects.

Main Results:

• A proposed "ethics of expertise" framework.
• Guidelines for scientists to promote public and political autonomy.
• Application of the framework to a case study on toxicological information.

Conclusions:

• The ethics of expertise offers a model for scientists navigating uncertain, contentious public debates.
• Informed consent principles can be adapted to guide scientists in fulfilling their societal obligations.
• Effective dissemination of scientific information is crucial for autonomous decision-making.