Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Older but wilier: In-group accountability and the development of subjective group dynamics
Dominic Abrams1, Adam Rutland, Lindsey Cameron
1Department of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom. D.Abrams@kent.ac.uk
Abstract:
To test social and cognitive variables that may affect the development of subjective group dynamics, the authors had 224 children between the ages of 5 and 12 years evaluate an in-group and an out-group and normative and deviant in-group members under conditions of high or low accountability to in-group peers. In-group bias and relative favorability to normative versus deviant in-group members (differential evaluation) increased when children were accountable to peers and as a function of perceptions of peer group acceptance of these members (differential inclusion). These effects were significantly larger among older children. Multiple classification ability was unrelated to judgments of group members. This study shows that the development of subjective group dynamics involves an increase in sensitivity to the normative aspects of the intergroup context.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Robbers Cave
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Deindividuation
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Impact of Groups on Individuals
