Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Normalization of ground reaction forces.

David R Mullineaux1, Clare E Milner, Irene S Davis

  • 1DATA Squared (contact via http://www.dataswuared.org).

Journal of Applied Biomechanics
|January 12, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Core Content Related to Teaching Biomechanical Aspects of Human Movement for Physical Therapist Students: A Modified Delphi Study.

Journal, physical therapy education·2026
Same author

Machine learning classifiers for automatic classification of foot strike patterns from 2D video.

Sports biomechanics·2026
Same author

Ankle Joint Biomechanics in Recreational Runners with Resolved and Incident Plantar Fasciitis: A One-Year Prospective 4HAIE Cohort Study.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2026
Same author

Biomechanical insights into Achilles tendinopathy risk and protection in runners: a large prospective study 4HAIE.

British journal of sports medicine·2026
Same author

The influence of sex on shoulder and hip joint resting position and mobility in elite golfers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Integration of coordination and kinetic analysis reveals mechanisms of upper limb joint loading and technique-specific strategies in female gymnastics.

Sports biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Erratum. Validity of Poststroke Gait Spatiotemporal and Joint Excursion Metrics Between Inertial Measurement Units and a Marker-Based System.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Different Starting Block Distances on Internal Tibial Load in Elite Sprinters.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Altered Lower-Limb Dynamics in Stop-Jump Activity of Adolescents With Major Thoracic Scoliosis.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical Differences During Overground Walking in Virtual Reality: A Comparative Study With a Real Environment.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Relative Schoolbag Mass on Gait Biomechanics of South African Adolescents: The Role of Sex and Grade.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Influence of Body Configuration on Kinetics and Multijoint Control Strategies Sprinters Use During the First Step Out of Blocks.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Normalizing ground reaction forces by body mass (BM) is recommended for comparing runners. Different normalization methods impact covariate effects, with fitted normalization showing promise for loading rates.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement Analysis

Background:

  • Data normalization is crucial for reducing covariate effects in biomechanical studies.
  • Understanding the relationship between ground reaction forces and body mass is essential for analyzing running mechanics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate different data normalization methods (ratio, nonlinear, fitted) for ground reaction force variables in relation to body mass.
  • To determine the most effective normalization technique for minimizing the influence of body mass on running biomechanics.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded ground reaction forces from 40 female subjects running at a consistent speed.
  • Applied ratio, 0.67-nonlinear, and fitted normalization techniques to force data and analyzed power exponents.
  • Assessed the explained variance and statistical significance of body mass effects before and after normalization.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Ratio normalization (forces/BM1) significantly reduced explained variance for forces (e.g., peak-impact-vertical from 70% to <0.1%).
  • Fitted normalization effectively reduced body mass effects on loading rates (2-16%), with exponents near theoretical predictions.
  • Power exponents after normalization were not always statistically different, highlighting the need for further investigation.

Conclusions:

  • Ratio normalization to body mass is recommended for comparing ground reaction forces between individuals of different body masses, aligning with Newtonian mechanics.
  • Fitted normalization shows potential for analyzing loading rates, but further research is needed to determine the optimal normalization strategy.
  • The choice of normalization method significantly influences the interpretation of biomechanical data related to body mass.