Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Orthotopic Rat Kidney Transplantation: A Novel and Simplified Surgical Approach
Published on: May 7, 2019
Immunosuppression for dual kidney transplantation with marginal organs: the old is better yet
J M Cruzado1, O Bestard, L Riera
1Department of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universitat de Barcelona, Feixa Llarga s/n, 08907 I'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression did not improve outcomes in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) for older patients with marginal organs. Standard calcineurin inhibitor protocols showed comparable or better results in patient survival and graft function.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Immunology
- Immunosuppression
Background:
- Dual kidney transplantation (DKT) commonly uses calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) for immunosuppression.
- Optimizing immunosuppressive protocols in DKT, especially for older recipients with marginal donor organs, remains an area of research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of a CNI-free immunosuppressive protocol versus a standard CNI-based regimen in older patients undergoing DKT with marginal donor organs.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study involving 36 patients treated with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone versus 42 patients treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG), sirolimus (SRL), MMF, and prednisone.
- Outcomes assessed included delayed graft function, acute rejection, CMV infection, patient and graft survival, renal function, proteinuria, and uninephrectomy rates.
Main Results:
- Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was similar between the CsA and SRL groups.
- Three-year patient survival was higher in the CsA group (89%) compared to the SRL group (76%).
- Proteinuria was higher, and uninephrectomy rates were numerically higher in the SRL group, associated with renal failure.
Conclusions:
- A CNI-free immunosuppressive protocol using rATG, SRL, MMF, and prednisone does not offer advantages over a standard CsA, MMF, and prednisone regimen in DKT for older patients with marginal organs.
- The standard CNI-based protocol demonstrated comparable or superior outcomes in terms of patient survival and graft complications.
Abstract:
Immunosuppressive protocols in dual kidney transplantation (DKT) are based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We wonder whether a CNI-free immunosuppression can improve outcome in older patients receiving a DKT with marginal donor organs. Thirty-six were treated with CsA, MMF and prednisone (CsA group) and 42 with rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone (SRL group). Incidence of delayed graft function and acute rejection was 44% and 11% in the CsA group, and 40% and 8% in the SRL group. CMV infection incidence was low in both protocols. Three-year patient survival was 89% in the CsA and 76% in the SRL group. One- and 3-year graft survival after censoring for dead with a functioning allograft was 94.2% and 94% in CsA and 95% and 90% in SRL, respectively. Renal function was similar in both groups whereas proteinuria was higher in the SRL group. Uninephrectomy due to graft thrombosis or urinary-related complications was numerically higher in the SRL (21%) than in the CsA group (8%) (p = 0.13) and it was associated with renal failure and proteinuria. In DKT, a new induction immunosuppressive protocol based on rATG, SRL, MMF and prednisone does not offer any advantage in comparison to the old CsA, MMF and prednisone.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...

