Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patients who challenge.

Michael Ward1, Julian Savulescu

  • 1Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, UK. michael.ward@nda.ox.ac.uk

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Anaesthesiology
|January 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical psychedelic research in adolescents: a scoping review and overview of ethical considerations.

The Lancet. Child & adolescent health·2025
Same author

Digital Doppelgängers, Human Relationships, and Practical Identity.

Bioethics·2025
Same author

Chat-IRB? How application-specific language models can enhance research ethics review.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

When to create embryos or organoids for research.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same author

Generative AI in healthcare education: How AI literacy gaps could compromise learning and patient safety.

Nurse education in practice·2025
Same author

Academic freedom, artificial intelligence and the blandification of ethics.

Journal of medical ethics·2025
Same journal

Reimagining cardiac surgery-the emerging role of prehabilitation and risk optimization.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Prehabilitation and enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2026
Same journal

The role of biomarkers in the preoperative evaluation of cardiac surgical patients - A narrative review.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Magic in a bottle? A Focused review of factor concentrates for the intraoperative treatment of acquired coagulopathy - Fibrinogen concentrate, prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant activated factor VII.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2025
Same journal

ESAs in perioperative anemia management: Who, what, how and why?

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2025
Same journal

Does patient blood management represent good value for money?

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2025
See all related articles

Respecting patient autonomy means honoring diverse values, even for challenging choices. Doctors should support rational, individual decisions while respecting patient autonomy and well-being.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Patient Autonomy

Background:

  • Modern medical practice emphasizes respecting patient individuality and diverse values.
  • Patient autonomy is a core principle in contemporary healthcare.
  • Conflicting values can arise when patients make choices perceived as irrational or harmful.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the meaning of respecting diverse values in medical practice.
  • To analyze the ethical challenges posed by controversial patient choices.
  • To provide guidance on navigating patient autonomy and medical best interests.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of ethical principles.
  • Discussion of clinical scenarios involving challenging patient decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of medical ethics literature on autonomy and paternalism.

    • Main Results:

    • Respecting diverse values is crucial for patient autonomy.
    • Challenging choices may stem from altruism, risk tolerance, or unusual values.
    • Paternalistic refusal to respect controversial choices can undermine autonomy.
    • Doctors should help patients make rational, individual choices.

    Conclusions:

    • Facilitating competent individuals' controversial choices is ethically mandated, with considerations for well-being and public interest.
    • Balancing patient autonomy with medical judgment requires careful ethical deliberation.
    • Shared responsibility between clinicians and patients is key for informed decision-making.