Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Research audit and publication.

Brian J Pollard1

  • 1The University of Manchester, Central Manchester and Manchester Children's University Hospitals NHS Trust, UK. brian.pollard@manchester.ac.uk

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Anaesthesiology
|January 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of increasing oximetry usage in India: A pilot study.

Indian journal of anaesthesia·2011
Same author

Delta sleep-inducing peptide alters bispectral index, the electroencephalogram and heart rate variability when used as an adjunct to isoflurane anaesthesia.

European journal of anaesthesiology·2009
Same author

The vagus nerve as a conduit for neuroinvasion, a diagnostic tool, and a therapeutic pathway for transmissible spongiform encephalopathies, including variant Creutzfeld Jacob disease.

Medical hypotheses·2006
Same author

Anaesthesia acronyms and abbreviations.

European journal of anaesthesiology·2004
Same author

Dying: rights and responsibilities.

The Medical journal of Australia·1989
Same journal

Reimagining cardiac surgery-the emerging role of prehabilitation and risk optimization.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Prehabilitation and enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2026
Same journal

The role of biomarkers in the preoperative evaluation of cardiac surgical patients - A narrative review.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2026
Same journal

Magic in a bottle? A Focused review of factor concentrates for the intraoperative treatment of acquired coagulopathy - Fibrinogen concentrate, prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant activated factor VII.

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2025
Same journal

ESAs in perioperative anemia management: Who, what, how and why?

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2025
Same journal

Does patient blood management represent good value for money?

Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology·2025
See all related articles

Research ethics and publication standards have evolved significantly. Adherence to ethical guidelines, like the Declaration of Helsinki, ensures integrity in scientific research and publication across Europe.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Research Integrity
  • Publication Ethics

Background:

  • The ethics of research, audit, and publication have seen substantial development over the past fifty years.
  • The Declaration of Helsinki serves as the global standard for researcher conduct.
  • Centralized ethics review systems, such as the Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) in the UK, govern research activity across Europe.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the ethical considerations in scientific research, audit, and publication.
  • To emphasize the importance of ethics committee approval and informed consent.
  • To address challenges in discerning research from audit and managing publication ethics.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of ethical frameworks and regulatory structures in research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Exploration of consent issues concerning vulnerable populations (unconscious patients, children).
  • Analysis of publication ethics, including data falsification, plagiarism, and authorship issues.

    • Main Results:

    • Ethics committees play a crucial role in overseeing research.
    • Informed consent is paramount, though challenging in specific patient groups.
    • Publication of all study outcomes, regardless of results, is encouraged to prevent data manipulation.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized ethical review systems are essential for research integrity.
    • Addressing publication misconduct, such as data fabrication and plagiarism, is critical.
    • Deterrents like sanctions and professional oversight help maintain ethical standards in scientific publishing.