Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

On lie detection "wizards".

Charles F Bond1, Ahmet Uysal

  • 1Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth, Texas 76129, USA. c.bond@tcu.edu

Law and Human Behavior
|January 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Predicting weaning failure in critically ill older patients: secondary analysis of a national multicenter prospective cohort in Türkiye.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Design and synthesis of fluorescent calix[4]arene-1,8-Naphthalimide derivatives: Transparent biofilms, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, and real-samples applications.

Food chemistry·2026
Same author

Trivalent Rare Earth Adsorption at Phosphonic Acid Monolayers.

Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry·2025
Same author

Exploring the Utility of <i>Prunus mahaleb</i> Extracts as a Source of Natural Bioactive Compounds for Functional Applications.

Food science & nutrition·2025
Same author

Direct observation of carbon dioxide adsorption and binding at the air/aqueous interface.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Isatin-modified Calixarene derivatives: A comprehensive study on synthesis, enzyme inhibition, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and Antiproliferative activities.

Bioorganic chemistry·2025
Same journal

Viewing police body-worn camera video of use-of-force incidents: Does repeated or slow-motion viewing matter?

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

Psychopathy in the context of adversity: Understanding associations of early-life adversity and psychopathic symptoms in a sample of justice-involved youth.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

Race and ethnicity in the courtroom workgroup: Can diversifying the court solve racial and ethnic disparities in case outcomes?

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

The justice motive: Retributive and restorative factors affect public evaluations of child protection.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

A risk-need-responsivity (RNR)-informed systematic review of needs during the pretrial period.

Law and human behavior·2026
Same journal

When we do not care about what happens to "criminals": How character judgments influence indifference to incidental suffering in the criminal justice system.

Law and human behavior·2026
See all related articles

Statistical analysis questions claims of "wizards" in deception detection. The study suggests chance, not special skill, explains past findings, urging caution in identifying lie detection expertise.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistical Analysis
  • Deception Detection

Background:

  • M. O'Sullivan and P. Ekman (2004) reported identifying 29 individuals with exceptional lie detection abilities, termed 'wizards'.
  • This claim suggests a specialized skill in discerning truth from deception beyond typical human capacity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To statistically critique the evidence presented for the existence of deception detection 'wizards'.
  • To evaluate whether the claimed 'wizardry' is statistically supported or attributable to chance.
  • To propose criteria for identifying genuine deception detection expertise.

Main Methods:

  • Statistical re-analysis of the evidence presented by O'Sullivan and Ekman (2004).
  • Application of standard statistical logic used in psychological research to assess the significance of findings.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Conceptual outlining of evidential standards for diagnosing deception detection abilities.

    • Main Results:

    • Statistical analyses indicate that chance can account for the results attributed to 'wizardry'.
    • The evidence presented does not meet the usual statistical thresholds for claiming exceptional abilities in deception detection.
    • The authors' claims of 'wizardry' are deemed statistically gratuitous based on the provided data.

    Conclusions:

    • The existence of 'wizards' in deception detection, as claimed by O'Sullivan and Ekman, is not statistically substantiated.
    • Further research requires rigorous statistical evidence to support claims of extraordinary lie detection skills.
    • The commentary provides a framework for future research to identify and validate genuine expertise in deception detection.