Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Rationale and public health implications of changing CHD risk factor definitions
1Departments of Health Services and Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1772, USA. rmkaplan@ucla.edu
Insights
Lowered diagnostic thresholds for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and impaired fasting glucose now classify most adults as having a chronic condition. This study examines the health and financial outcomes of these expanded disease definitions.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Medical Diagnostics
- Health Policy
Background:
- Disease definition and diagnostic guidelines are fundamental to medical practice and public health policy.
- Recent years have seen lowered diagnostic thresholds for common conditions like high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and impaired fasting glucose.
- These changes have led to a significant expansion of the healthcare market and reclassification of a large portion of the adult population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the health and financial outcomes associated with revised diagnostic thresholds for cardiovascular disease and stroke risk factors.
- To assess the impact of updated guidelines for blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose.
- To provide estimates on the number of individuals affected, cost implications, and overall public health consequences.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of health and financial outcomes related to changes in diagnostic thresholds.
- Evaluation of guidelines for blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose.
- Estimation of affected populations, costs, and public health impacts.
Main Results:
- Lowered diagnostic thresholds for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and impaired fasting glucose result in a substantial increase in the number of adults requiring medical attention.
- Under the latest proposed thresholds, a very high percentage of the adult population meets criteria for a chronic condition diagnosis.
- Significant implications for healthcare utilization, costs, and public health are associated with these guideline changes.
Conclusions:
- Changes in diagnostic thresholds significantly expand the definition of disease, impacting a large segment of the adult population.
- The study highlights the need to carefully consider the health and financial consequences of evolving diagnostic criteria.
- Further research is needed to fully understand the long-term public health impact of these broadened diagnostic definitions.
Abstract:
The definition of disease is central to the practice of medicine and to public health policy. Practice guidelines set standards for disease identification and treatment. Quality care is often defined as adherence to these guidelines. Over the past few years, the diagnostic thresholds for several common medical conditions have been lowered, resulting in a substantial expansion in the market for health care. The most recent guidelines for high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and impaired fasting glucose each define a high percentage of the adult population as in need of regular medical attention. Under the latest proposed thresholds, virtually the entire adult population qualifies for a chronic condition diagnosis. We evaluate the health and financial outcomes associated with changes in diagnostic thresholds for the prevention of three risk factors for cardiovascular disease and stroke: blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and fasting plasma glucose. Estimates of the numbers of people affected, the cost implications, and the overall public health consequences are offered.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...