Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Not All Rules Are Equal: Rare Conditional Rules Shape Behaviour but Yield to Global Probability in Passive Listening.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

The Impact of Action Intention Versus Action-Effect Intention on Auditory Prediction Error Signals.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Measuring the Genuine Mismatch Negativity in the Auditory Multi-Feature Paradigm.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

The sound of silence: Omission responses and how the brain predicts in the absence of sound.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Auditory N1 Suppression and Omission N1 Do Not Share a Common Underlying Mechanism.

Psychophysiology·2025
Same author

Auditory facilitation in deterministic versus stochastic worlds.

Cognitive neuroscience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction.

Alexandra Muller-Gass1, Erich Schröger

  • 1Institut für Psychologie I, Universität Leipzig, Seeburgstr. 14-20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. muller-gass@uni-leipzig.de

Brain Research
|January 16, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Distracting auditory stimuli disrupt cognitive tasks, especially when memory load is high. Increased attentional focus on a difficult task can amplify this distraction effect.

More Related Videos

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Auditory Perception
  • Human Attention

Background:

  • Task-irrelevant auditory changes can disrupt cognitive processing.
  • The impact of task difficulty on this distraction is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how auditory task difficulty modulates distraction caused by task-irrelevant stimulus changes.
  • To examine the role of perceptual load versus memory load in this modulation.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) and behavioral responses.
  • Subjects performed auditory temporal classification tasks under varying difficulty levels (perceptual vs. memory load).
  • Introduced infrequent, task-irrelevant pitch changes to assess distraction.

Main Results:

  • Task-irrelevant pitch changes consistently caused distraction, evidenced by performance decline and P3a ERP component.
  • Distraction was significantly amplified in the high memory load condition.
  • Distraction was not significantly enhanced in the difficult perceptual task condition.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory distraction is modulated by task demands, particularly memory load.
  • High memory load tasks, requiring greater attentional resources, exacerbate distraction.
  • Focused attention on demanding tasks may inadvertently enhance processing of distracting elements.