Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Antibiotic Efficacy Testing in an Ex vivo Model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms in the Cystic Fibrosis Lung
Published on: January 22, 2021
Is all free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration the same: implications for beta-lactam in vivo modelling
C Andrew DeRyke1, David P Nicolau
1Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
Abstract:
Previously, ertapenem 50 mg/kg every 6h given subcutaneously to mice achieved a similar 24-h cumulative free time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) to 1g every 24h in humans. However, this simplified regimen (SR) does not provide a superimposable concentration-time profile to that observed in humans, thus allowing concentrations to fluctuate above and below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) throughout the 24-h period. Herein, we compared a complex regimen (CR; 9 various mg/kg doses over 24 h) providing a near superimposable concentration-time profile with the SR to determine implications on bacterial kill against eight extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates over a wide MIC range. The CR resulted in a similar (+/-5%) 24-h cumulative fT>MIC to ertapenem 1 g every 24h in humans over an MIC range of 0.032 mg/L to 16 mg/L. Similar bacterial kill was observed with both regimens against all eight ESBL-producing isolates examined. In mouse models, it appears that the 24-h cumulative fT>MIC and not the distribution of the fT>MIC over 24 h drives efficacy.
Insights
A complex regimen (CR) of ertapenem in mice matched human dosing, showing that the total 24-hour exposure above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) drives bacterial kill, not dose timing.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology and Microbiology
- Antimicrobial Resistance
Background:
- Ertapenem dosing in mice previously achieved similar 24-hour cumulative free time above minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) to human dosing.
- However, simplified mouse regimens (SR) do not replicate human concentration-time profiles, leading to fluctuations above and below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare a complex regimen (CR) with a near-superimposable concentration-time profile to the SR in mice.
- To determine the impact of CR versus SR on bacterial kill against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing isolates.
Main Methods:
- Mice were administered ertapenem via a complex regimen (CR; 9 varied doses over 24h) and a simplified regimen (SR).
- Bacterial kill was assessed against eight ESBL-producing isolates across a wide MIC range (0.032 mg/L to 16 mg/L).
- Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters, specifically 24-h cumulative fT>MIC, were compared between regimens.
Main Results:
- The CR achieved a 24-h cumulative fT>MIC similar (+/-5%) to human ertapenem 1g every 24h dosing.
- Both CR and SR demonstrated comparable bacterial kill against all eight ESBL-producing isolates.
- Efficacy was driven by the 24-h cumulative fT>MIC, irrespective of dose distribution over the 24-hour period.
Conclusions:
- In mouse models, the 24-hour cumulative exposure of ertapenem above the MIC is the primary determinant of efficacy against ESBL-producing bacteria.
- The timing of drug concentrations within the 24-hour period is less critical than the overall cumulative exposure for achieving bacterial kill.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Bacterial Protein Synthesis
Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model
