Related Experiment Videos
Direct current shock ablation: quantitative assessment of proarrhythmic effects
J D Fisher1, G M Scavin, J A Roth
1Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY 10467.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|December 1, 1991
Summary
Direct current (DC) shock catheter ablation is a valuable treatment for tachycardias. This study found DC shock ablation has a low proarrhythmic potential in humans, with most detected events not leading to clinical issues.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Catheter ablation using direct current (DC) shock is a common treatment for various tachycardias.
- Concerns exist regarding the proarrhythmic potential of DC shock ablation due to rare fatal arrhythmias.
- Prospective assessment is needed to evaluate the proarrhythmic risk associated with DC shock ablation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To prospectively assess the proarrhythmic potential of direct current (DC) shock catheter ablation.
- To evaluate the incidence of proarrhythmic events following DC shock ablation using Holter monitoring and programmed electrical stimulation (PES).
- To compare the proarrhythmic risk of DC shock ablation in humans with findings in canine models and establish standards for future ablation modalities.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study involving 56 patients undergoing DC shock catheter ablation for tachycardias.
- Utilized matched pre- and postablation Holter monitors and programmed electrical stimulation (PES) to detect proarrhythmia.
- Clinical events were monitored throughout a prolonged follow-up period (mean 44 months).
Main Results:
- No immediate sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred during ablation.
- Four patients experienced sustained VT within 72 hours post-ablation; three were similar to baseline arrhythmias.
- Twelve patients met criteria for proarrhythmia based on Holter or PES, but only one had subsequent clinical events; DC shock ablation in humans showed lower proarrhythmia than in dogs.
Conclusions:
- Direct current (DC) shock catheter ablation demonstrates a low proarrhythmic potential in humans.
- Holter monitoring and PES have high negative predictive values but low sensitivity and specificity for detecting clinically relevant proarrhythmia post-ablation.
- The findings provide valuable comparative data for radiofrequency and other ablation techniques.