Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Online Explorative Study on the Learning Uses of Virtual Reality Among Early Adopters
Published on: November 22, 2019
The analysis of stratified 2 x 2 contingency tables
Vance W Berger1, Catalina Stefanescu, Yan Yan Zhou
1University of Maryland Baltimore County and National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Suite 3131, Bethesda, MD 20892-7354, USA.
This study evaluates statistical tests for binary outcomes in clinical trials. Novel tests are developed to improve power when treatment effects vary across patient groups, outperforming the standard Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test in such scenarios.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Trial Methodology
- Statistical Inference
Background:
- Binary response variables are common in clinical trials, necessitating robust statistical methods for comparing treatments across strata.
- The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test is frequently used but assumes a common odds ratio, which may not hold in practice.
- Issues arise regarding data pooling and the performance of standard tests when treatment effects (odds ratios) differ across strata.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the performance of statistical tests for independence against consistent treatment superiority with binary outcomes in stratified randomized clinical trials.
- To address challenges related to small/zero margins, common odds ratio assumptions, and the impact of differing odds ratios across strata.
- To develop and propose novel statistical tests that are more appropriate when odds ratios may vary.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the power profile of the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test under varying odds ratios.
- Development of new statistical tests analogous to Smirnov, modified Smirnov, convex hull, and adaptive tests.
- Evaluation of test performance in randomized clinical trial settings with binary outcomes and multiple strata.
Main Results:
- The commonly used Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test can exhibit a poor power profile when odds ratios differ across strata, despite its optimality under common odds ratios.
- Novel tests analogous to those for ordered categorical data demonstrate potential for improved power and appropriateness in situations with heterogeneous treatment effects.
- The study highlights the limitations of assuming a common odds ratio and the need for flexible analytical approaches.
Conclusions:
- Standard tests assuming a common odds ratio may be suboptimal in clinical trials where treatment effects vary.
- Newly developed statistical tests offer a more powerful and appropriate alternative for analyzing binary outcomes in stratified settings with heterogeneous treatment effects.
- This research provides valuable insights for biostatisticians and clinical researchers designing and analyzing trials with binary endpoints.
Related Concept Videos
Contingency Table
Introduction to Test of Independence
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
Determination of Expected Frequency
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
H0: The two variables (factors)...
McNemar's Test
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

