Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Maximum likelihood estimation of linkage and interference from tetrad data.

R Snow1

  • 1Department of Genetics, University of California, Davis, California 95616.

Genetics
|May 1, 1979
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Missed opportunities for impact in patient and carer involvement: a mixed methods case study of research priority setting.

Research involvement and engagement·2017
Same author

Experiments on bijugate apices.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2014
Same author

Use of clinical targets in diabetes patient education: qualitative analysis of the expectations and impact of a structured self-management programme in Type 1 diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2014
Same author

Setting research priorities for Type 1 diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2012
Same author

Understanding issues associated with attending a young adult diabetes clinic: a case study.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2011
Same author

A maternal diet supplemented with creatine from mid-pregnancy protects the newborn spiny mouse brain from birth hypoxia.

Neuroscience·2011
Same journal

Inherited long telomeres induce a genome-wide transcriptional response in budding yeast.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a Steadily Changing Environment.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Functional Landscape of Zebrafish Gonadotropins and Receptors: A Comprehensive Genetic Analysis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Synergistic actions of Nup43 and Myosin VI drive actin cone assembly during Drosophila spermiogenesis.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of two Cryptococcus neoformans heme transporters involved in Fhb1-mediated nitrosative stress protection in a fission yeast model.

Genetics·2026
Same journal

Analysis of a hypomorphic mei-P26 mutation reveals coordination between developmental programming of germ cells and meiotic chromosome dynamics.

Genetics·2026
See all related articles

Researchers analyzed genetic recombination interference in yeast species. Saccharomyces cerevisiae shows strong interference, while Schizosaccharomyces pombe exhibits weak or negative interference, suggesting fundamental differences in their recombination processes.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Yeast Genetics

Background:

  • Genetic linkage mapping relies on understanding recombination frequency.
  • Interference, the phenomenon where one crossover affects the likelihood of another, is a key factor in recombination.
  • Comparing interference patterns across species can reveal insights into the evolution and mechanisms of recombination.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive and apply maximum likelihood estimators for genetic map distance and interference.
  • To compare interference patterns between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe.
  • To investigate the relationship between interference and genomic features like centromeres.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of maximum likelihood equations for interference estimation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of two-point and ranked tetrad data.
  • Application of estimators to experimental data from S. cerevisiae and S. pombe.

    • Main Results:

    • S. cerevisiae demonstrated strong genome-wide interference.
    • S. pombe exhibited significantly weaker interference, with frequent instances of negative interference.
    • No significant difference in interference was observed for intervals spanning centromeres versus non-centromeric intervals in either species.
    • Recombination rates per DNA mass were similar between the two species.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant differences in recombination interference exist between S. cerevisiae and S. pombe.
    • These differences likely stem from fundamental variations in their respective recombination machinery or regulation.
    • Interference patterns do not appear to be strongly influenced by centromere proximity in these species.