Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

J N A Gibson1, G Waddell

  • 1Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Lothian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Little France, Edinburgh, UK, EH16 4SU. j.n.a.gibson@blueyonder.co.uk

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|January 27, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online songwriting reduces loneliness and postnatal depression and enhances social connectedness in women with young babies: randomised controlled trial.

Public health·2023
Same author

AOSpine Consensus Paper on Nomenclature for Working-Channel Endoscopic Spinal Procedures.

Global spine journal·2020
Same author

Effect of Endometrial Ablation on Premenstrual Symptoms.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
Same author

Functional outcomes following ceramic total joint replacement for hallux rigidus.

Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2011
Same author

A cost comparison of traditional drainage and SUDS in Scotland.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2008
Same author

Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2007

Surgical discectomy offers faster relief for lumbar disc prolapse sciatica than conservative care, though long-term effects are unclear. Microdiscectomy shows results comparable to traditional open discectomy for improved outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Orthopedics
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Lumbar disc prolapse is a common cause of low-back disorders, frequently necessitating surgical intervention.
  • Surgical treatments aim to alleviate pain and improve function in patients with debilitating disc herniation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the efficacy of various surgical interventions for treating lumbar disc prolapse.
  • To compare different surgical techniques and their outcomes based on available evidence.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive search of major databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed, Spine) and conference abstracts up to June 2006.
  • Inclusion of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized controlled trials (QRCTs) on surgical management.
  • Data extraction and quality assessment performed by two independent reviewers.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Thirty-nine RCTs and two QRCTs were identified, with many recent trials focusing on discectomy techniques and anti-adhesion membranes.
  • Discectomy demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to chemonucleolysis and placebo.
  • Microdiscectomy yielded results comparable to standard open discectomy; evidence for other minimally invasive techniques remains limited.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical discectomy provides rapid symptom relief for selected lumbar disc prolapse patients compared to conservative management.
  • Long-term impacts on the natural history of disc disease remain uncertain.
  • While microdiscectomy is comparable to open discectomy, evidence for newer minimally invasive approaches requires further investigation.