Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

J N A Gibson1, G Waddell

  • 1Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Lothian University Hospitals NHS Trust, Little France, Edinburgh, UK EH16 4SU. j.n.a.gibson@blueyonder.co.uk

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|April 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online songwriting reduces loneliness and postnatal depression and enhances social connectedness in women with young babies: randomised controlled trial.

Public health·2023
Same author

AOSpine Consensus Paper on Nomenclature for Working-Channel Endoscopic Spinal Procedures.

Global spine journal·2020
Same author

Effect of Endometrial Ablation on Premenstrual Symptoms.

Journal of minimally invasive gynecology·2016
Same author

Functional outcomes following ceramic total joint replacement for hallux rigidus.

Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons·2011
Same author

A cost comparison of traditional drainage and SUDS in Scotland.

Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research·2008
Same author

Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2007

Surgical discectomy offers faster relief for lumbar disc prolapse sciatica compared to conservative care. However, long-term effects on the disc disease remain unclear, and minimally invasive techniques require more evidence.

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Orthopedics
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Lumbar disc prolapse is a common cause of low-back disorders and a frequent indication for surgical intervention.
  • This review focuses on evaluating the efficacy of various surgical treatments for lumbar disc prolapse.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and assess the effects of surgical interventions for treating lumbar disc prolapse.
  • To compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques and conservative management.

Main Methods:

  • Searched major databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, PubMed, Spine) and conference abstracts for randomized and quasi-randomized trials up to January 2007.
  • Two reviewers assessed trial quality and extracted data, seeking additional information from authors when necessary.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Forty randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two quasi-randomized controlled trials (QRCTs) were identified.
  • Discectomy shows better outcomes than chemonucleolysis, which is better than placebo. Microdiscectomy results are comparable to standard discectomy.
  • Limited evidence suggests membranes can reduce scarring, but clinical outcome data is scarce. Evidence for other minimally invasive techniques is insufficient.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical discectomy provides faster relief for acute sciatica from lumbar disc prolapse than conservative management.
  • Long-term effects on the natural history of disc disease are still uncertain.
  • Microdiscectomy outcomes are similar to open discectomy; evidence for other minimally invasive methods is unclear.