Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatment options for acute otitis media

Andrew S Coco1

  • 1Von Hess Healthcare Research Center, Family and Community Medicine, Lancaster General Hospital, Lancaster, PA 17604-3555, USA. ascoco@lancastergeneral.org

Annals of Family Medicine
|January 31, 2007
PubMed

Insights

For acute otitis media in children, delayed antibiotic prescription is cost-effective. Longer amoxicillin courses (7-10 days) are more effective but costly, while watchful waiting may be cheapest if nonattendance rates are high.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric infectious diseases
  • Health economics
  • Clinical decision-making

Background:

  • Acute otitis media (AOM) is a common childhood illness.
  • Treatment guidelines vary, with options including observation and antibiotics.
  • Understanding the cost-effectiveness of different AOM management strategies is crucial for healthcare providers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the costs and utility of observation versus routine antibiotic treatment for pediatric acute otitis media.
  • To compare the cost-effectiveness of watchful waiting, delayed prescription, and different durations of amoxicillin therapy.

Main Methods:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis in children aged 6 months to 12 years.
  • Interventions: watchful waiting, delayed prescription, 5-day amoxicillin, 7-10 day amoxicillin.
  • Primary outcome: cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

Main Results:

  • Delayed prescription was the least costly; 7-10 day amoxicillin was most effective.
  • The incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) for 7-10 day amoxicillin vs. delayed prescription was $56,000/QALY.
  • Watchful waiting and 5-day amoxicillin were inferior strategies. Results varied with nonattendance rates for delayed prescription.

Conclusions:

  • Both observational approaches and routine amoxicillin treatment for AOM are economically viable.
  • The optimal strategy depends on specific clinical context and cost-effectiveness thresholds.
Abstract