Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Process for development of multicenter urodynamic studies.

Charles W Nager1, Michael E Albo, Mary P Fitzgerald

  • 1University of California, San Diego, Women's Pelvic Medicine Center, San Diego, California, USA. cnager@ucsd.edu

Urology
|February 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sacrospinous Hysteropexy With Mesh vs Vaginal Hysterectomy for Treatment of Uterovaginal Prolapse: 10-Year Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA surgery·2026
Same author

Urethral Morphology and Support Associated with Urinary Symptoms after Vaginal Surgery with and without Midurethral Sling.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Stool Microbiota, Metabolites, and Fecal Incontinence in Women.

Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

MRI 2-D Parameters Associated with Native Tissue or Transvaginal Mesh Surgical Apical Prolapse Repair Failure.

International urogynecology journal·2026
Same author

Community Engagement Methods for an Urgency Urinary Incontinence Trial.

Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same author

Methods for a Community-Engaged Randomized Trial for Urgency Incontinence.

Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)·2026
Same journal

Editorial Comment on "A Histopathologic Assessment of Prostate Ductal Anatomy in Relation to Micro-Ultrasound".

Urology·2026
Same journal

Same-Day Discharge Following Multiport Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Prospective Feasibility Study of Outcomes, Costs, and Post-Discharge Healthcare Utilization.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Extended versus Standard Lymph Node Dissection at the Time of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Intractable Epistaxis and Severe Hypertension in a Young Woman.

Urology·2026
Same journal

A 53-Year-Old Man with Elevated PSA and a Cystic Pelvic Lesion.

Urology·2026
Same journal

Low-Grade, Papillary Bladder Tumors A plea for in-office fulguration.

Urology·2026
See all related articles

Standardizing multicenter urodynamic studies (UDSs) through continuous quality improvement is crucial for reliable results. This involved developing detailed protocols and interpretation guidelines for consistent testing across multiple centers.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Medical Devices
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Multicenter urodynamic studies (UDSs) often exhibit significant variability in testing procedures, equipment, and interpretation.
  • Standardization is essential to ensure the reliability and comparability of UDS data across different institutions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To detail the implementation of a continuous quality improvement (CQI) process for standardizing multicenter urodynamic studies (UDSs).
  • To describe the development and application of standardized UDS protocols and interpretation guidelines within a multi-institutional network.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a comprehensive quality control process including protocol creation and tester certification.
  • Implemented central review for protocol compliance and standardized equipment and signal configurations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Established an electronic signal repository and UDS Interpretation Guidelines.

    • Main Results:

    • Successfully implemented a standardized UDS protocol with 20 testers across nine centers for a multicenter surgical trial.
    • The protocol provides explicit guidelines for equipment, calibration, patient positioning, annotations, and data recording.
    • UDS Interpretation Guidelines offer recommendations for validity, plausibility, and data interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Multicenter UDSs necessitate a robust continuous quality improvement framework.
    • The development and adherence to standardized UDS testing procedures and interpretation guidelines are vital for accurate and consistent outcomes.