Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 17, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Quality Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy (QUASIMS): a comparison of interferon beta therapies for
Volker Limmroth1, Rolf Malessa, Uwe Klaus Zettl
1Dept. of Neurology, Cologne City Hospitals, University of Colognen, Ostmerheimerstr. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. limmrothv@kliniken-koeln.de
Abstract:
Interferon beta (IFN beta) preparations are the most frequently prescribed therapies for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). Several open-label observational studies report similar efficacy among IFN beta preparations. The Quality Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis Therapy (QUASIMS) study is a large, open-label observational study designed to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of available IFN beta preparations as disease-modifying therapies for relapsing MS across a wide range of clinical practice settings. This retrospective, controlled cohort study was conducted by chart review at 510 sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Enrolled patients had received one of the four available IFN beta preparations/dosing regimens (intramuscular IFN beta-1a 30 microg 1x/week [Avonex], subcutaneous (SC) IFN beta-1a 22 or 44 microg 3 x/week [Rebif], or SC IFN beta-1b 250 microg 3.5x/week [Betaferon/Betaseron]) for >or= 2 years. Pre-planned outcomes at 1 and 2 years included change from baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, percentage of progression-free patients (< 1.0 EDSS point), annualised relapse rate (RR), percentage of relapse-free patients, and reasons for therapy change. Of 4754 evaluable patients, 3991 (84%) received IFN beta as initial therapy. There were no significant differences among IFN betas when used as initial or follow-up therapy on almost all outcome variables. Relapse rate was consistently higher and percentage of relapse-free patients consistently lower for all products used as follow-up versus initial therapy. Results of QUASIMS showed similar effectiveness among IFN beta products. Benefits were consistently superior when IFN beta was used as initial rather than follow-up therapy. Our results suggest that patients do not benefit in terms of disease outcome from switching between IFN beta preparations/dosing regimens.
Insights
Interferon beta (IFN beta) treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) show similar effectiveness. Switching between different IFN beta therapies does not improve patient outcomes, with initial therapy being more beneficial than follow-up treatment.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Interferon beta (IFN beta) preparations are primary disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS).
- Previous studies suggest comparable efficacy among different IFN beta formulations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of available IFN beta preparations in relapsing MS patients.
- To evaluate the impact of initial versus follow-up therapy with IFN beta preparations.
Main Methods:
- A large, retrospective, open-label observational cohort study (QUASIMS) involving 510 sites in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
- Chart review of 4754 patients treated with one of four IFN beta preparations for at least two years.
- Outcomes assessed included changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), relapse rates, and reasons for therapy change.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in effectiveness were observed among the evaluated IFN beta preparations, whether used as initial or follow-up therapy.
- Patients receiving IFN beta as initial therapy demonstrated consistently superior outcomes (lower relapse rates, higher relapse-free rates) compared to those on follow-up therapy.
- Switching between IFN beta preparations did not lead to improved disease outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Available Interferon beta preparations demonstrate similar effectiveness for treating relapsing multiple sclerosis.
- Initiating therapy with an IFN beta preparation is more beneficial than switching between them later.
- Patients with MS are unlikely to gain additional benefits from switching between different IFN beta therapies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Sclerosis l: Introduction
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis

