Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The 36-item short form.

Alpesh A Patel1, Derek Donegan, Todd Albert

  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
|February 6, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outcomes after navigated lumbar fusion: Readmission, reoperation, and complications in 18,561 procedures.

Journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same author

History of total knee arthroplasty is associated with increased risk of revision following subsequent lumbar fusion.

Journal of orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Cervical paraspinal sarcopenia affects ability to achieve PROMIS minimal clinically important difference in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine·2026
Same author

Isolating the Effect of Surgeon Experience on Spine Surgery Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study Stratified by Procedure Type.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same author

Surgeon Experience and Patient Outcomes in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review of Tenure, Volume, and Performance.

JBJS reviews·2026
Same author

Identifying high healthcare utilizers following cervical spine surgery using comprehensive predictive modeling techniques.

Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine·2026
Same journal

Dementia as a Marker of Poor Outcome After Hip Hemiarthroplasty.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Fix or Replace: Evidence for Treatment Options in the Management of Femoral Neck Fractures.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Epidemiology, Treatment Patterns, and Comorbidities of Trigger Finger: A Contemporary Population-Based Analysis.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Posterior Approaches to Pilon Fractures: Considerations, Indications, and Outcomes.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Effect of Season on Patient-reported Outcomes and Discharge Disposition in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
Same journal

Impact of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Alert Resolution on Motor Deficits and Short-Term Outcomes After Spine Fusion.

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2026
See all related articles

The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) is a reliable general health survey for orthopaedic research. While useful, its limitations in assessing extremity function and daily activities require careful consideration.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Patient-derived outcome measures are increasingly vital in orthopaedics.
  • Quality-of-life instruments include general and condition-specific questionnaires.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form (SF-36) as a general health survey in orthopaedic research.
  • To identify the strengths and limitations of the SF-36 in assessing patient quality of life within orthopaedic contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Review of the application and validation of the SF-36 in orthopaedic literature.
  • Analysis of the SF-36's capabilities in defining disease, evaluating treatment effects, and comparing conditions.

Main Results:

  • The SF-36 is a validated, reliable, self-administered general health survey widely used across disciplines.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Demonstrated limitations include bias towards lower extremity function and restricted assessment of daily activities and quality-of-life changes.

    • Conclusions:

    • The SF-36 is a valuable tool in orthopaedic surgery when its effectiveness and limitations are understood.
    • Awareness of the SF-36's biases is crucial for accurate interpretation of quality-of-life data in orthopaedic patients.