Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Co-expression-based models improve eQTL predictions for transcriptome-wide association studies and highlight new schizophrenia-associated genes.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Genetic Risk and Resilience for Schizophrenia Stratified by Perinatal Gene Expression Predict Adult Cognitive Performance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Magnetoencephalographic Microstates Reveal Disrupted Brain Activity Patterns in Schizophrenia Controlling for Treatment-Related Modulations.

Schizophrenia bulletin·2026
Same author

Behavioral and Personality Changes as the First Manifestation of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2.

Cerebellum (London, England)·2026
Same author

The challenges of implementing hybrid baselines for the interpretation of longitudinal behavioral data from individuals.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

Neurobiological Signatures of Trauma, Personality, and Depressivity: A Transdiagnostic Machine Learning Study in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Biological psychiatry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Differentiating allocation of resources and conflict detection within attentional control processing.

Giuseppe Blasi1, Terry E Goldberg, Brita Elvevåg

  • 1National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, USA.

The European Journal of Neuroscience
|February 8, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals how the brain manages attentional control under increasing demands. Higher demands activate the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and dorsal cingulate, differentiating conflict detection and resource allocation.

More Related Videos

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroimaging

Background:

  • Attentional control is crucial for managing cognitive resources.
  • Prior research suggests distinct neural bases for conflict detection and attentional resource allocation.
  • The impact of escalating demands on these processes remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of increasing attentional control demands.
  • To differentiate the brain regions involved in conflict detection versus attentional resource allocation.
  • To introduce a novel task (variable attentional control task) for assessing these cognitive functions.

Main Methods:

  • Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed.
  • Thirty-four healthy subjects performed the variable attentional control (VAC) task.
  • The VAC task systematically varied demands for conflict detection and attentional resource allocation.

Main Results:

  • Increased attentional control demand correlated with heightened activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, and dorsal cingulate.
  • Enhanced conflict detection specifically engaged the dorsal cingulate.
  • Increased demand for attentional resource allocation was linked to greater activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal and parietal cortices.

Conclusions:

  • The study successfully parsed the neural components of attentional control.
  • Distinct brain regions are involved in conflict detection and attentional resource allocation.
  • The findings provide insights into the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive control under varying task demands.