Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Protein structural variation in computational models and crystallographic data.

Dmitry A Kondrashov1, Adam W Van Wynsberghe, Ryan M Bannen

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. dkon@biochem.wisc.edu <dkon@biochem.wisc.edu>

Structure (London, England : 1993)
|February 13, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Farewell and thank you note.

Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Sequence-based calculation of local energetic frustration in proteins.

Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence in structural biology: Preface.

Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Completion of partial structures using Patterson maps with the CrysFormer machine-learning model.

Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology·2025
Same author

Happy 100th, structural biology.

Structural dynamics (Melville, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Functional and Structural Studies on the Esperamicin Thioesterase and Progress toward Understanding Enediyne Core Biosynthesis.

Journal of natural products·2025
Same journal

Structure of Perinereis linea erythrocruorin reveals a compact extracellular globin megacomplex.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Meet the author: Stephen Brohawn.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Tetraspanins bring Norrin into focus: Structural insights into ligand-specific Wnt signaling.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Uncovering subtype-selective activation of the K<sub>Ca</sub>3.1 channel by SKA-111.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Identification and structure determination of a type III-Bv CRISPR complex that post-translationally modifies an associated toxin.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Cryo-EM structure of the Arabidopsisthaliana ribosome in translating and non-translating states.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
See all related articles

Normal mode analysis effectively models protein flexibility. All-atom potentials, especially CHARMM, best predict flexibility directionality, surpassing simpler models for enhanced accuracy in structural biology.

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology
  • Computational biophysics
  • Protein dynamics

Background:

  • Normal mode analysis (NMA) is a key computational method for understanding protein conformational flexibility.
  • Anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) from crystallography provide experimental data on atomic motion and directionality.
  • Evaluating different NMA potentials is crucial for accurate modeling of protein dynamics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the predictive accuracy of various Normal Mode Analysis (NMA) potentials using crystallographic data.
  • To compare the ability of different potentials in predicting both the magnitude and directionality of protein conformational flexibility.
  • To determine the performance of elastic network models versus all-atom force fields, including CHARMM, for NMA.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculation of normal modes using four elastic network model potentials and the CHARMM all-atom force field.
  • Analysis of a dataset comprising 83 diverse, ultrahigh-resolution protein crystal structures.
  • Comparison of predicted flexibility (magnitude and directionality) against experimental anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs).

Main Results:

  • All five tested potentials accurately predicted the magnitude of protein flexibility.
  • All-atom potentials, particularly the CHARMM force field, demonstrated superior accuracy in predicting the directionality of conformational changes.
  • Low-frequency modes from CHARMM showed notable differences compared to elastic network models, indicating distinct dynamic behavior.

Conclusions:

  • The CHARMM all-atom force field offers the highest prediction quality for protein conformational flexibility, especially directionality.
  • The choice of potential in Normal Mode Analysis involves trade-offs between complexity and predictive accuracy.
  • This study highlights the benefits of using sophisticated all-atom potentials for detailed modeling of protein dynamics.