Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Validation scheme and procedures to analyze consequential validity].

José Luis Padilla1, Juana Gómez, Maria Dolores Hidalgo

  • 1Universidad de Granada, Spain. jpadilla@ugr.es

Psicothema
|February 14, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

First Report of <i>Agroathelia rolfsii</i> Causing White Fruit Rot in Oil Palm Hybrid OxG in Colombia.

Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Likert Scales: A Practical Guide to Design, Construction and Use.

Psicothema·2025
Same author

Smoldering Myocarditis Unmasked by Pembrolizumab-Induced Myositis: Delayed-Onset Double M Syndrome.

JACC. Case reports·2025
Same author

Our lifestyles are back to 'normal', but is our mental health? Longitudinal assessment of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic among Spanish adults: April 2021 to August 2022.

PLOS global public health·2024
Same author

Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale: A Systematic Review Using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Spanish validation of the pure procrastination scale: dimensional structure, internal consistency, temporal stability, gender invariance, and relationships with personality and satisfaction with life.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same journal

Personal Recovery in Addictions: Development of a new Assessment Instrument.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Internet Habits, Problematic Internet Use, and Online Risk Practices Among Adolescents With ADHD in Spain.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Relationship Between Social Connectedness and Quality of Life in Older Adults: An Examination of Sex Differences.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

The Influence of Gender on Measuring Mental Health Stigma. A Cross-Sectional Vignette Study With the Attribution Questionnaire 9.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Comprehensive Assessment of Mental Health Stigma.

Psicothema·2026
Same journal

Psychometric Properties of the Teachers' Responses to Bullying Questionnaire (TRBQ) in Spanish Students.

Psicothema·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces an argument-based validation scheme to assess testing consequences, integrating semantic and political inferences for comprehensive evaluation. It offers practical examples and proposes procedures for effective consequence validation.

Area of Science:

  • Educational Measurement
  • Psychometrics
  • Testing and Assessment

Background:

  • Current validation methods may not fully address the multifaceted consequences of testing.
  • Distinguishing between semantic and political inferences is crucial for a holistic validation approach.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a unified argument-based validation scheme for assessing testing consequences.
  • To demonstrate the scheme's application in educational and disability testing contexts.
  • To propose procedures for validating testing consequences.

Main Methods:

  • Developing a validation scheme integrating semantic and political inference validation.
  • Applying the scheme to assess high-stakes educational tests.
  • Applying the scheme to validate adjustments in standardized tests for individuals with disabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed scheme effectively combines the validation of semantic and political inferences.
  • The scheme provides a framework for gathering evidence on assumptions underlying test inferences.
  • Case studies illustrate the practical utility of the validation scheme.

Conclusions:

  • The argument-based validation scheme offers a robust approach to evaluating testing consequences.
  • The scheme is suitable for diverse testing applications, including high-stakes and accommodations.
  • Further discussion is needed on its specific applicability in contexts like Spain.