Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Patient decision-making for clinical genetics.

Gwen Anderson1

  • 1School of Nursing, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA. gwen@andersearch.org

Nursing Inquiry
|February 15, 2007
PubMed
Summary

Understanding genetic testing decisions requires exploring personal thinking styles beyond cognitive theories. Couples utilize diverse thinking types, such as analytical, ethical, and practical, to navigate prenatal genetic testing choices.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leadership Strategies to Increase Psychological Safety of Nurses: A Longitudinal Study.

Quality management in health care·2024
Same author

Decision-making about prenatal genetic testing among pregnant Korean-American women.

Midwifery·2017
Same author

Genomic Competencies for Nursing Practice: Implications for Nursing Leadership.

The Journal of nursing administration·2016
Same author

Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency.

Worldviews on evidence-based nursing·2015
Same author

Genomics education for Veterans Affairs nurses.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2014
Same author

Nurse residency programs: an evidence-based review of theory, process, and outcomes.

Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing·2012

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Medical Decision-Making
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Genetic services are increasingly integrated into healthcare for various diseases.
  • Current understanding of patient decision-making regarding genetic information relies heavily on cognitive theories.
  • Prenatal genetic testing presents complex choices for expectant parents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore and describe the decision-making process couples use when considering prenatal genetic testing.
  • To develop a conceptual model of decision-making in the context of genetic technology.
  • To identify the various thinking styles employed by individuals during genetic testing decisions.

Main Methods:

  • A phenomenological-hermeneutic descriptive study.
  • Convenience sample of 12 couples (24 individuals: 12 men, 12 women).
  • 32 semi-structured interviews, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using three levels of coding.

Main Results:

  • Identified three emergent meta-themes regarding couples' sense-making and meaning-finding in prenatal genetic technology use.
  • Discovered nine distinct types of thinking employed during the decision-making process: analytical, ethical, moral, reflective, practical, hypothetical, judgmental, scary, and second sight.
  • Found that decision-making is perceived as a process of engaging with one's personal thinking style.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive theories alone do not fully capture the complexity of genetic testing decisions.
  • Individuals utilize a diverse range of thinking styles, individually or in combination, to make informed choices about genetic testing.
  • A deeper understanding of these personal thinking styles can inform healthcare providers and improve patient support in genetic counseling.

Related Experiment Videos