Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Missing data: prevalence and reporting practices.

Todd E Bodner1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97207, USA. tbodner@pdx.edu

Psychological Reports
|February 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 40-Item Smell Identification Test in People With Cystic Fibrosis.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2026
Same author

Transfer of a leadership training intervention prior to COVID-19 on leadership support during the pandemic.

Journal of managerial psychology·2026
Same author

Sleeping To Support? The Interactive Effects of Leader Sleep Quantity and Quality on Leader- and Employee-Reported Support Behaviors.

Occupational health science·2026
Same author

Prospective Associations Among Loneliness and Health for Servicemembers: Perceived Helplessness and Negative Coping Appraisal as Explanatory Mechanisms.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Abridging the 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) in People With Cystic Fibrosis: Limiting Survey Burden.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2025
Same author

Olfaction, Eating Preference, and Quality of Life in Cystic Fibrosis Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

The Laryngoscope·2025
Same journal

Psychological Impacts of Instagram Use: The Interplay of Social Comparison, Self-Esteem, and Anxiety.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

The Effect of Self-Compassion on Shame in Post-Event Processing.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Tracking Rumination as a Stable Habit (TRASH); Scale Modification and Convergent Validity in a Clinical Sample of Youth With a History of Depression.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Prompting to Practice: Daily Practice Mediates the Benefits of Supplement to a Mindfulness-Based Intervention.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

Continued Influence Effect: A Three-Dimensional Framework Shaping Practical and Theoretical Perspectives.

Psychological reports·2026
Same journal

ADHD Symptoms, Interpersonal Functioning, and Sexual Orientation in Undergraduate Adults.

Psychological reports·2026
See all related articles

Missing data affects one-third of studies, with varied analytical methods and reporting. This research provides baseline data on missing data prevalence and practices in psychological research.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Missing data is a common issue in empirical research.
  • Reporting practices for studies with missing data have evolved over time.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the prevalence of missing data in psychological research.
  • To evaluate reporting practices for studies with missing data.
  • To establish baseline data for tracking future improvements in reporting standards.

Main Methods:

  • A random sample of empirical research journal articles from the PsychINFO database for 1999 was analyzed.
  • Prevalence of missing data and reporting practices were assessed.

Main Results:

  • Approximately one-third of the studies examined contained missing data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analytical methods and reporting practices for missing data varied significantly across studies.
  • Conclusions:

    • The findings highlight the need for consistent reporting standards for missing data.
    • This study serves as a baseline to evaluate progress in addressing missing data issues in psychological research.