Pain in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a comparison of different lithotripters in volunteers

The aim of the present study was to investigate pain sensations experienced during extracorporeal shock-wave application, comparing an electrohydraulic (MPL 9000; Dornier Medizintechnik, Germering, Germany), an electromagnetic (Lithostar Plus; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), and a piezoelectric (Piezolith 2300; Wolf, Knittlingen, Germany) shock-wave system. In nine healty volunteers, three therapeutically used intensities were applied in a randomized order with each lithotripter (MPL 9000: 16, 20, and 24 kV; Lithostar Plus: settings 5, 7, and 9; and Piezolith 2300: settings 2, 3, and 4). The subjects received nine series of 20 shock waves amounting to a total of 180 shock waves per session. The treatment was performed under clinical conditions, and no premedication was given. A visual analog scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire were used for assessment of pain. In addition, somatosensory evoked potentials caused by shock-wave stimulation were recorded. Some of the volunteers were unable to bear the pain caused by the highest shock-wave intensity of the electrohydraulic (n = 3) and the electromagnetic system (n = 4). Estimates using the visual analogue scale showed increased pain sensations with increasing energy settings for each lithotripter. The amplitudes of the somatosensory evoked potentials became larger, and latencies shortened with increasing stimulus intensities (P less than 0.05). Subjective estimates by means of the visual analogue scale (P less than 0.01) as well as the McGill Pain Questionnaire (NS) and the somatosensory evoked potentials (P less than 0.05) showed that stimulation by the piezoelectric lithotripter was less painful than stimulation by the two other generators.