Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: May 10, 2022
Observer- and self-rated alexithymia in eating disorder patients: levels and correspondence among three measures
Sylvie Berthoz1, Fabienne Perdereau, Nathalie Godart
1Department of Psychiatry for Adolescents and Young Adults, IMM, Paris, France; Univesity Paris V, Paris, France. sylvie.berthoz@imm.fr
Objectives:
Our objectives were to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS) in eating disorder patients, alexithymia severity across diagnostic subgroups, and correspondence among three alexithymia measures.
Method:
Seventy-five women, each with an eating disorder diagnosis, completed two alexithymia self-reports, the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Bermond-Vorst Alexithymia Questionnaire-version B (BVAQ-B), and asked a relative or an acquaintance to rate them using the OAS.
Results:
The OAS showed acceptable discriminant validity and interrater reliability. Patients' OAS scores were higher than scores reported for people-in-general samples and lower than those for outpatient clinical samples. No statistically significant OAS, TAS-20, and BVAQ-B score differences were found between the patients with anorexia nervosa restrictive type and those with bulimia nervosa. OAS, TAS-20, and BVAQ-B total scores were moderately, positively, and significantly correlated.
Conclusion:
These clinical data show the psychometric strength of the OAS, which reasonably can be recommended for use with the TAS-20 in research and clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Anorexia Nervosa
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Schemas
Self-Report Tests of Personality
