Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict.
Andrea Kiesel1, Wilfried Kunde, Joachim Hoffmann
1Department of Psychology, Julius Maximilians University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 11, Germany. kiesel@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|March 3, 2007
Summary
Conflict resolution mechanisms operate in a task-specific manner. Target-related conflict reduced prime-induced conflict, but only when following irrelevant stimulus-response rules, not relevant ones.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Task-switching paradigms reveal response conflict when targets elicit different responses.
- Subliminal primes can also induce conflict, independent of the target.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the interaction between target-induced and prime-induced response conflict.
- To determine if conflict resolution mechanisms are task-specific.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed a task-switching paradigm with both target-related and subliminal prime-induced conflict.
- Analysis focused on how target conflict modulated prime conflict and vice versa.
Main Results:
- Target-related conflict reduced prime-induced conflict effects within the same trial.
- Target conflict modulated prime conflict based on irrelevant stimulus-response rules, but not relevant ones.
- Trial-to-trial modulations of target congruency effects occurred in task repetition trials, but not task switch trials.
Conclusions:
- Conflict resolution mechanisms function in a strictly task-specific manner under the studied conditions.
- This suggests distinct neural pathways or processing for different task rules.


