Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2026

Use of an Integrated Low-Flow Anesthetic Vaporizer, Ventilator, and Physiological Monitoring System for Rodents
Published on: July 9, 2020
Assessing data quality in manual entry of ventilator settings
David K Vawdrey1, Reed M Gardner, R Scott Evans
1Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5750, USA. david.vawdrey@hsc.utah.edu
Automatic data collection for ventilator settings significantly improves accuracy and efficiency compared to manual charting by respiratory therapists. This technology reduces charting delays and errors, enhancing patient care protocols.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Respiratory Care
- Clinical Engineering
Background:
- Manual charting of ventilator settings by respiratory therapists can introduce data quality issues.
- Incorrect data may negatively impact automated ventilator management protocols.
- Evaluating data accuracy is crucial for optimizing patient care in intensive settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the data quality of manually charted ventilator settings.
- To determine the impact of data inaccuracies on computerized ventilator management.
- To compare manual charting with automatic data acquisition.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 29,054 charting events from 678 ventilated patients over 12 months.
- Comparison of manually entered ventilator settings with automatically acquired data via Medical Information Bus (MIB).
- Measurement of data matching percentage and charting delay.
Main Results:
- Data matching rates varied from 99.0% for PEEP to 75.9% for low tidal volume alarms.
- Average charting delay was 6.1 minutes per event.
- 3.9% of protocol suggestions were based on mismatched data.
Conclusions:
- Automatic data collection enhances charting efficiency and reduces errors.
- Eliminating manual data entry improves data accuracy for ventilator management.
- Even with good manual practices, automation offers significant benefits.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
