Related Experiment Videos
Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: literature survey
William Lee1, Jonathan Bindman, Tamsin Ford
1Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK.
Background:
Case-control studies are vulnerable to selection and information biases which may generate misleading findings.
Aims:
To assess the quality of methodological reporting of case-control studies published in general psychiatric journals.
Method:
All the case-control studies published over a 2-year period in the six general psychiatric journals with impact factors of more than 3 were assessed by a group of psychiatrists with training in epidemiology using a structured assessment devised for the purpose. The measured study quality was compared across type of exposure and journal.
Results:
The reporting of methods in the 408 identified papers was generally poor, with basic information about recruitment of participants often absent. Reduction of selection bias was described best in the "pencil and paper" studies and worst in the genetic studies. Neuroimaging studies reported the most safeguards against information bias. Measurement of exposure was reported least well in studies determining the exposure with a biological test.
Conclusions:
Poor reporting of recruitment strategies threatens the validity of reported results and reduces the generalisability of studies.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Blind Procedures
Correspondence Bias
Blinding