Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computational classification of classically secreted proteins.

Eric W Klee1, Carlos P Sosa

  • 1Stabile 3-15, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Drug Discovery Today
|March 3, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of a Polygenic Risk Score with Diagnosis and Outcomes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026
Same author

A Second Report of a Missense Variant in AMMECR1 Causing Midface Hypoplasia, Hearing Impairment, Elliptocytosis, and Nephrocalcinosis: Case Report and Literature Review.

Clinical genetics·2026
Same author

Clinical and genetic characterization of constitutional MLH1 promoter hypermethylation: Implications for Lynch syndrome diagnosis.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2026
Same author

Unmasking Compound Heterozygosity in GYG1 Myopathy: Diagnostic Insights From RNA-Seq and Long-Read Genomics.

Clinical genetics·2026
Same author

Identification of a Novel Missense Homozygous Variant in LINS1 in Two Distinct Iranian Families With Consanguineous Marriage.

Molecular genetics & genomic medicine·2026
Same author

Genomic profiling reveals molecular heterogeneity in patients with Richter transformation (RT) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

Leukemia research·2025
Same journal

Organoid-AI platforms need integrated governance in drug discovery.

Drug discovery today·2026
Same journal

Inorganic nanoparticles for diagnostics, drug delivery and therapy for solid tumors.

Drug discovery today·2026
Same journal

HDAC11 as a potential therapeutic target for Alzheimer's disease.

Drug discovery today·2026
Same journal

From biologics to small-molecule modulators: The evolving landscape of interleukin-targeted therapeutics.

Drug discovery today·2026
Same journal

Targeting the GLP-1 receptor pathways for dual management of obesity and depression.

Drug discovery today·2026
Same journal

Chemical intervention strategies targeting MYC for cancer therapy.

Drug discovery today·2026
See all related articles

Identifying secreted proteins is crucial for drug development and biomarker discovery. This review benchmarks recent in silico prediction tools, aiding researchers in selecting optimal software for secretory protein identification.

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Secreted proteins play vital roles in cellular communication and disease.
  • Accurate identification of secreted proteins is essential for targeted therapies and biomarker discovery.
  • Computational tools are increasingly used for predicting protein localization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and benchmark the performance of recent in silico prediction programs for identifying classically secreted proteins.
  • To provide researchers with data-driven insights for selecting appropriate prediction tools.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art in silico prediction programs for secretory proteins.
  • Benchmarking program performance using an independent dataset of annotated human proteins.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Performance metrics for various prediction programs are presented.
  • Insights into the strengths and weaknesses of different computational approaches are provided.

Conclusions:

  • The benchmarking results offer guidance for investigators in choosing the most effective prediction tools.
  • Informed selection of in silico programs can enhance the efficiency of secreted protein identification in research and development.